Should Wikipedia ban people from editing?

Controversy has erupted among Wikipedia's core contributors, after a rogue editor revealed that Wikipedia's top administrators are using a secret insider mailing list to crackdown on perceived threats to their power.

Is this merely trying to protect free speech on a site where free speech is supposedly sacred, or does the list allow the "ruling clique" to push its agenda without scrutiny from the community at large?

You choose.

http://www.youchoose.net/campaign/should_w...le_from_editing

Yuchews = Noclews

Jonny

That may be the worst-constructed survey I've seen in a year. See my comment on the survey results page for reasons.

Greg

...and that takes some doing around the scholars of Wikipedia. But to be fair it is only a little worse than the Chinese community college students who translated their survey's text using a beta version of Babelfish. That's the one that prove Mr. Wales was the Sole Flounder. Or was it squid jellyfish?