Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: More Evidence of FT2’s Bestiality Pushing Sockpuppetry
> Wikimedia Discussion > Editors > Notable editors > FT2
Docknell
These diffs show a very clear relationship between FT2 and TBP, plus they show the use of the sockpuppet to push pro-NLP and pro-zoophilia POV:

FT2 and TBP working one after another. FT2 mitigating bestial activities (no evidence of harm to the horse that was sexually assaulted):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=25825883

Working on the same section as FT2 at the same time:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=25744609

Working on the same paragraph within the same 24 hours:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=26179177

FT2 using TBP to remove sourced information about the low IQ etc of zoophiles (explicitly). (Devious POV forking):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=25718121

Pushing for normality of sexual attraction to animals (unsourced):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=25825503

Pushing for zoosexuality (another fringe way of normalizing bestiality):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=25743532

Working consequently on zoosadism article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=26172376

Working on the same line in Rainbow Bridge article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=53424758
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=56516785

Working on the same issues of the emotion in animals article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=53417457

Working on the ethology article, one diff after another
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=53416286

Working on FT2’s favorite pro-zoo researcher on the same sentence
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=52712773
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=52713521


NLP related:

More diffs one after another: TPB makes a statement about being trained by top NLP promoters (FT2’s clear COI) etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=26610872

TBP giving FT2's reply:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=27742611
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=27741807
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=..._in_the_Opening


Defending TBP as a sockpuppet in the NLP discussion, but not admitting to sockpuppetry:
http://static.wikipedia.org/new/wikipedia/...tatement_by_FT2

FT2’s sockpuppetry continuing until FT2 is close to request for adminship:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=53428153

Judging by the NLP article, it’s also pretty clear that meats are also used and protected by FT2. There is definitely more information to come.

Doc
Peter Damian
Interesting FT2 says this

QUOTE
One editor, User:TBP, was explicitly self-identified as a sock puppet on his talk page before becoming involved in this article Oct 17 DIFF. He played no part in the vote or its discussion, and only a minor role in the talk page debate, mostly between Oct 27-29.
http://static.wikipedia.org/new/wikipedia/...tatement_by_FT2


As though it were only the voting that mattered. What also matters is force of numbers. If you think there are two people (FT2 and TBP) holding the same view against you, it is much harder to argue your case (and more likely you will lose your temper also).
Proabivouac
QUOTE(Docknell @ Mon 14th July 2008, 6:09am) *

Defending TBP as a sockpuppet in the NLP discussion, but not admitting to sockpuppetry…
FT2’s sockpuppetry continuing until FT2 is close to request for adminship:

Tarantino observed this earlier…
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...indpost&p=99940
…and, later, that FT2 virtually admitted it on his userpage:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...09&#entry109909
Docknell
QUOTE(Proabivouac @ Mon 14th July 2008, 7:06am) *

QUOTE(Docknell @ Mon 14th July 2008, 6:09am) *

Defending TBP as a sockpuppet in the NLP discussion, but not admitting to sockpuppetry…
FT2’s sockpuppetry continuing until FT2 is close to request for adminship:

Tarantino observed this earlier…
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...indpost&p=99940
…and, later, that FT2 virtually admitted it on his userpage:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...09&#entry109909



Hi PB
I think Lovingboth is a slightly different issue. It requires a little more scrutiny there. Looks like a fairly obvious meat though. Pretty obvious mistake with the dodgy noticeboard signing.

Definitely TBP is a sock, and POV pushing is definitely the game as its on the same articles exactly.

Its seems likely that FT2 is still working with socks on the same or similar articles. It may be worth looking for editors who stop activity whenever FT2 is under scrutiny or busy trying to wriggle out of strife.

Certainly FT2 is using socks or whatever comes to hand in order to protect particular crank POVs on specific articles. The fact that FT2 is still being allowed to work in such a way seems to point to a pretty serious corruption issue with the whole of WP admins. The evidence is just too obvious to ignore and it can only be brushed under the carpet unconvincingly.

Doc

Peter Damian
I've updated the useful links thread

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19011 with a link to a list of all FT2's NLP-related edits: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=111637

Lovingboth is a puzzle for me. It caused me to change my opinion that FT2 is based in the US (his editing pattern is either of someone who is an early US sleeper/riser or is a late UK one - could be either). He clearly knows Lovingboth. I don't think he is him, however. Editing patterns and areas of interest are quite different. Education and cultural interests also.

Another puzzle is how Lovingboth hadn't made any edits for some months before FT2 'accidentally' logged in as him. It really is a mystery.
Docknell
More info that any wiki/nonwikipedian can look up

FT2’s and/= TBP’s contribution lists are evidence enough that FT2 is a sockuser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...=500&target=TBP

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...user&target=FT2

The FT2/TBP arguments are all the same on the NLP talkpage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=26610872




Q. Do all NLP practitioners really have such a strong interest in zoophilia?

Also, just reading through FT2’s other nlp article diffs gives me some hope that some good has been done by the majority who voted to delete other such psychobabbling promotional NLP trash.

Q. How is it that FT2 feels he can get away with all his nonsense?

Doc
Milton Roe
QUOTE(Docknell @ Tue 2nd September 2008, 7:32pm) *

More info that any wiki/nonwikipedian can look up

FT2’s and/= TBP’s contribution lists are evidence enough that FT2 is a sockuser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...=500&target=TBP

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...user&target=FT2

The FT2/TBP arguments are all the same on the NLP talkpage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=26610872


Here's a list of articles FT2 and TBP edited together. Interestingly, they edited NO user and user:talk pages together. TBP just didn't speak to users that FT2 spoke to, except on article talk pages. Otherwise, they shared many unusual interests:

1 Zoosexuality - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Zoosadism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 Zoophilia - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Rainbow_Bridge_(pets) - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 Neuro-linguistic_programming - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 Mr_Hands - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 Loss - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 List_of_unusual_deaths - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Kenneth_Pinyan - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Hani_Miletski - edited by 2 of 2 users
#11 Great_ape_personhood - edited by 2 of 2 users
#12 Ethology - edited by 2 of 2 users
#13 Enumclaw,_Washington - edited by 2 of 2 users
#14 Emotion_in_animals - edited by 2 of 2 users
#15 Edgeplay - edited by 2 of 2 users
#16 Death - edited by 2 of 2 users
#17 Animal_love - edited by 2 of 2 users
#18 Animal_loss - edited by 2 of 2 users
#19 Animal_cognition - edited by 2 of 2 users

#1 Talk:Zoophilia - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Talk:Neuro-linguistic_programming - edited by 2 of 2 users

PS. You may wonder what the hell is the Enumclaw, Washington article. Well, famous for being the home of Kenneth Pinyan, Mr. Hands. Proving that you really can die by having some stallion tear you a new one. So to speak.
Proabivouac
FT2, for the third time:
If User:TBP wasn't you, why did you take credit for his work?
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=125253
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.