QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 19th September 2008, 6:09pm)
QUOTE(Alex @ Fri 19th September 2008, 5:27pm)
My table only includes successful requests. I don't see the purpose in keep old RfAs like those.
They'd potentially be useful were someone to say "oppose, total asshole" in an RFA and one wanted to point out their "nominate, this guy's great" a month previously – but aside from a few cases like that I agree with deleting them. They just make things confusing if the candidate actually does run for RFA, as there would be a RFA2 without an RFA1.
If there was an RfA 2, they shouldn't be deleted. There's RfAs of users that never accepted, malformed, indef blocked etc. RfAs that were actually serious should obviously be kept for the record.