I telephoned the Arizona Superior Court Pima County and asked for a photocopy of the document mentioned on Valerie Henson's website. These are the scans of everything they mailed to me:
http://www.zooomr.com/photos/qwerty612/sets/40679/

Here, David Gerard perpetuates a revenge-BLP against a non-notable person on WP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=29167413

it's ironic that Gerard is, by these same standards, more notable as the guy who banned a large population of Utah from WP.



in the Henson BLP, this appears:



the "ref" there is some "linux" related personal website with a copy of some bullshit from 1987.

Who knew that Druids are known for making UFO's? i thought they just made stonehenge, extreme-goth fashion precedents, and public whoopee.

this article (Henson BLP) is awful.

It's mostly sourced to personal websites, not reliable sources.

If I were to edit "Naked Short Selling" and post Freedom of Information Act documents from the SEC disclosing "failure to deliver" statistics to it, those edits would be removed as "Personal Research".

Regardless of how fucked over you feel Henson is or isn't, Wikipedia is not supposed to be an advocacy platform with material referenced by personal research sourced to personal websites and blogs.

Regardless of whether how famous david gerard became on a usenet group. Lol.

I'm sure there are several reliable sources who delve into the henson/scientology kerfluffle that can be cited to flesh out an article. Get MacSlimmy on it. She's a stickler for reliable sources.

Why are you trying to add divorce papers of some guy to his Wikipedia article? And I mean, you were actually trying to add a scanned copy to the article itself.

qwerty612, I think you misunderstand the focus of this site. People around here tend to be opposed to "anyone can edit" biographies when they're used to attack people.

I cannot fathom why you want the line items of a divorce in his article, but it doesn't belong in Wikipedia, and this crap has no business here either.

and now let's talk about WP's priorities with respect to oversight.

Protect the evidence that Linda Mack, a former classmate of Patrick Byrne, edits WP as Slim Virgin, by oversighting some very specific (to put it kindly) edits she made to the Pierre Salinger BLP, and to articles related to the Lockerbie bombing? Oversight it all!

But edit summaries that obviously implicate a marginally news-notable person of child abuse, as these edits summaries do:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&action=history


well, no need to oversight those edits. Keith's (as far as i know), not a role-playing-gamer on WP like Slimmy, or JoshZ, or Gerards' wives are. So no worries there.

Damn. That's sleazy.
Who the hell is "Jack Russell Terrier"?
I could all-too-easily picture one of Poodle Boy's minions posting this crap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=214835339