QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 13th March 2009, 6:50am)

QUOTE(VDyk @ Fri 13th March 2009, 11:11am)

Can't argue with Jayjg & co there. Why the hell would anyone think that's appropriate content for an encyclopedia? (Although it
got discussed a few months ago on Wikipedia and someone did claim it was "notable", with our old friend "it got mentioned somewhere, that means we need an article on it".)
I think Jayjg's involvement here is peripheral, it came to his attention, and he spoke out in favor of deletion, but if you read the deletion request you'll see the whole thing predates his involvement by quite a bit. Many folk have spoken out in favor of deletion (including Mike Godwin, who opined that he'd personally favor it being removed) and many of those arguing in favor of retention are (at least in my view) folks who tend to argue to keep everything regardless of how outrageous it is, and some of whom tend to argue against BLP as a problem that needs action.
I have no fondness for Mr. Dershowitz, but I was among those voices arguing that this image is out of scope, defamatory, and not needed. See also discussion on WP at:
Talk:Carlos_Latuff#File:Alan_dershowitz_by_Latuff.jpg...
QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 13th March 2009, 6:50am)

(adding) Good thing the "delete" voters haven't come across
BabyKillerZionbies.gif yet…
That specific file may not have been discussed, not sure, but I think most would view it as different from the Dershowitz cartoon, as it is a political viewpoint without a specific reference to a particular person, not a defamation of a particular person. (there have been other Latuff deletion requests in the past)