Sue Gardner said:
QUOTE
We've interviewed 65 people, including Board and Advisory Board members, staff, editors, onlookers, critics, supporters, and external subject-matter-experts...
I looked over the
list of people interviewed, and I failed to see one "critic" of the Wikimedia Foundation. (Could someone help me if you do see one?)
So, I asked on the Discussion page, if someone could enlighten us as to which "critics" were interviewed.
Philippe's two-step response:
QUOTE
18:03, 20 January 2010 Critics? Which one(s)? Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) Deleted (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
(
link)
QUOTE
17:40, 20 January 2010 Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) blocked Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎
(
link)
Someone needs to slap
that little man-boy Philippe across the face.
Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project is a censored and blockable offense?
I hereby call on every Wikimedian in good standing to go to that Discussion page, and ask the same question, until it is answered.