Well this has been an exciting week at castle Wikivania.
First Jimbozo is forced to clip his founder's wings, and now Wizardman (who owes his seat to him) has stepped down from the ArbCom.



Given how much he craves petty-power and enjoys the game, I'm somewhat skeptical about the above. Ex-ArbCons really don't have much influence and no power, unlike under the Fred Bauder court. There has to be more going on here.

Speculation?
(Comicals are always welcome!)

Anyone with inside info?
(Please PM me, if you don't wish to post it here;)

No great loss.



Money on the table that he is going to be outed as a sock of a "banned" user.

Ahhh yes... the ArbCom. They were big back in the day. What ever happened to those guys?

Would not be surprised. He's already been caught violating COI, and trying to cover up the evidence.

(And please don't try to tell me he isn't Dan Tylicki, former Baldwin-Wallace College student. Too much proof.
He even wrote the WP article about the college's founder.)


Don't know, don't care, please don't encourage them to "do something"......

Or what? This site would have something to discuss?

Oh, between Wiki-Porn, Larry Sanger, "malamanteau" words, Jimbo's founder bits, and the like, we've had plenty to discuss lately. Boring old ArbCom would simply be a distraction. Try to keep up, McBride.

(Warned you I'd nick that pic Cedric

Or he knowingly covered for someone else's sock.
I place 500 Quatloos on each contingency.




True.
But too often in the midst of the big stories the relevant little ones are lost.

I'm surprised no one mentioned that he was busily approving Theleftorium's blatantly plagiarised GANs to help him get through the WikiCup and, when pointed out that there were major plagiarism concerns he just shrugged his shoulders and continued to pass pages with blatant plagiarism without any care.

This was while sitting on the ArbCom, after all. I could also point out that he started the whole Persian Empire war and I was involved in it mostly to defend his reputation, and then he bailed on me during the ArbCom trial (funny how the major incident leading up to the matter isn't mentioned at all).

Or maybe it's just like he said, maybe he's preoccupied with writing content and doesn't want to hang onto an ArbCom seat when he's not doing any of the work. Maybe?

Interestingly, Hersfold just resigned too. That leaves 11 active arbitrators. Aren't there supposed to be 18? Maybe someday people will listen to the two simple reforms I've been proposing: full annual elections, and filling vacancies by promoting the next ranking candidate from the last election.

That would require "reform", silly boy. It won't happen. The whole thing will collapse first.

Actually, there was an RfC on the process last year, and surprisingly enough the community's preferences were adopted. So it's really not an issue of inertia, corruption, or anything like that: it's just bad decision-making. There was a vote on the full annual election proposal, and it was resoundingly rejected. People want "institutional memory", I suppose. I say if someone has a memory worth preserving, they should be re-elected every year. Personally I think the ArbCom would be better off forgetting absolutely everything it did before 2009 (except perhaps for the purposes of "truth and reconciliation"...), and even for the period since then some selective amnesia would be beneficial.

No great loss, either.

Who do you think is the next to go?

SirFozzie.

Personally, I can see Mailer Diablo bowing out...in terms of temperament, he doesn't really fit in with the others.

If someone gives you good odds on that, let me know. I could make a fortune.

No, seriously, have no reason to, not burned out, still find things a challenge.. and still learning things (Alastair 2 was my first draft decision), for example

I think you guys may start getting snowed-under without Wizardman, Hersfold, and the others who have left to help share the load. Why not have an out-of-cycle election in a couple of months? You can say that you're doing it because it was suggested on Wikipedia Review.

Why have an out-of-cycle election? Just go down the list--much simpler.

It won't happen. And you know damned well why---it would be "out of process", or
"unauthorized", or whatever flaky term Wikilawyers use to keep anything from changing.

If you like, I'll loan you a dollar. So you can buy yourself a clue.

My personal thoughts... The committee has ducked below 11 before, in the past few years.. this is why they bumped the committee up to 18.. to have this bit of a cushion. We'll be back up to 13 shortly (MD is back, and Cool Hand Luke has stated that he will be returning shortly), so I don't really see a need.

Also, other reasons:

1) Elections are a pain in the ass to set up and to administer. Trust me, we're learning that right now with the CU/OS elections.

2) We already have a CU/OS election running till the end of May, I think even trying to have a quick election would be time consuming (quick meaning, what, 2 weeks to nominate, 2 weeks for questions, 2 weeks for voting? That'd take us to Mid July, and then 2 more weeks to get everyone identified to the foundation and up to speed with the various mailing lists and the like.. August.. and then there's another election starting three months from then?

Also, here's something to consider.. the Committee's workload is, quite frankly, not that big right now. We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests (the first time in a very long time I can remember there isn't at least one request), We have one case already in voting (Transcendental Meditation) and one about to hit voting (Russavia-Biophys).. but.. that's really it.

So as things stand right now, we'd be electing someone for a short term where there's not much to do.

Okay, it just seems that the cases you all have right now are taking awhile to get resolved. The Transcendential Meditation case, for example, is finally starting to get some action on the proposed decision, and it opened 12 weeks ago.

While I'd really not like to broadcast my thoughts publicly, a lot of that is due to discussion delays.. there are allegations all over the place of plagarism, coordinated editing in a meat/sockpuppet manner, non-NPOV, etcetera etcetera etcetera. Trying to write an arbitration finding that solves each of these things is not easy..

What we're trying to do is write a decision that gets people back to editing harmoniously within Wiki's principles. The reaction that the PD got (on the talk page, for example), made at least some of us realize that what we have probably will not do that. We're trying to rectify that.

Is there any chance that this is because ArbCom is held in universally low esteem?

*shrugs* I do not know, doubt it, but you can think so if you want.

Probably a more accurate reason (at least to me), is that we're wrapping up the school year in a lot of areas, and with warmer weather as we get closer to summer, people find better things to do then to argue on Wikipedia?

I wonder if it would be possible to get that mentioned in this article?

Face it though, for a significant demographic, the only meaning summer has is a glare on the monitor.

So go down the list. Or at least explain why you think that would be a bad idea.

Ok, I can do that...

Right now, we would need four replacement arbs (we started at 18, we have 12, and two inactives). If we went down the list, we would have two people who fell just short (AGK and RUslik0), with around 56-57% support.. but if we went any further, we'd be getting people who got 51-52%. Do you think the community would really be supportive if there were new members of the committee who BARELY got a majority of support?

I can't imagine why they wouldn't be. In order to be properly representative and reasonably productive (by ArbCom standards, at least), the ArbCom should be A) composed of the people who got the highest number of votes in the last election and B) fully staffed. If some arbitrators decide they don't want to do the job anymore, then the results of the last election need to be reconfigured to reassign the seats that have been vacated.

This whole paragraph sounds really silly.

Of course, there is always the option of actually paying for professional editorial management of the site, as opposed to expecting telephone help desk operators, law school students or hospital risk managers to be able to handle tasks for which they have no educational or occupational training.

Yes, it involves spending money -- but in the long run, it makes more sense to have three or four trained professionals versus 18 clueless amateurs.

I suppose if ArbCom is really bored, they could take up cases they shied away from before (like Moulton vs. IDCab). Not because I have any great desire to be vindicated or readmitted, but because there were so many unresolved fundamental issues in that case that are not particular to me (or to IDCab), but recur in many similar cases.

Sounds like ArbCom, not the cases it hears.

You're going to buy cows when milk is free?

Dealing with AN would be a good way to help improve Arbcom's public reputation.
Well, maybe. No guarantees. But doing anything is better than being "on hiatus".

If nothing will be done, then please explain to us all why AN gets away with shit like this.


If the "free" milk is lumpy and smells bad, yes.

Yes. For starters, Arbcom can explain how they awarded themselves subpoena power when there is no such authority spelled out for them in WP policy. They can also explain why they disabled the account of an editor who, in no way whatsoever, violated the clearly-defined policies of WP:BLOCK. And since it appears that AN is under observation for alleged "socking" via IP edits, perhaps old lady arbitrator Risker would care to identify the "socks" that she allows to participate on WP, as per her astonishing acknowledgment during last September's Law/The_Undertow debacle, with a compare-and-contrast regarding why those "socks" can play on WP but AN cannot?

Well, one could conceivably claim that we have no authority over list.wikia.com. But I do agree that it.. does not show A Nobody in a good light.. let's say. He's made a comment over on the Arbs meta pages.. but I think we'll be handling this in an expedited manner, either by a motion or a case.

The comment: "I have logged out of Wikipedia permanently and disabled my email after throwing out my password which can be confirmed per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/A_Nobody this]. I have not only disabled it from Wikipedia, Wikia, and here, I also deactivated it from Yahoo to be sure that I can never re-log into Wikipedia under my old username."

So, whatever you do will be moot. That seems to be par for ArbCom, though.

Considering he's still editing as an IP, I hardly think it's moot, Ottava.

You still don't get it. You're not the one drinking the milk. Who the hell cares what kind of a court and police system you have, if you yourself never have to worry about being judged by it? The Lords of the Shire are never arrested by the Reeve in a feudal system. They're above all that. So who the *&%$ cares if the Reeve (sheriff) is crappy and occasionally hangs the wrong person? It will be a peasant, whoever it is.

Actually, this quote is the money shot: "I have nothing to really feel bad about anymore." Good for him -- getting all of that bad blood out his system is the best news. More power to ya, AN -- a lot of the Wikipediots could learn from that.



Don't be too harsh -- for some of the arbitrators, this is the most important thing that they'll ever accomplish in their lives.

That Wikia wiki needs a list:

* List of women with whom Jimmy Wales has been intimately linked

Intimately linked??? How about Jimbo, Risker and Orlady in a remake of "The Human Centipede"?

Stick SV on the end of that, and you've got my $12.50.

That is exactly the kind of nonsense that will alienate anyone who supports you. Even though I think he's been unfairly treated for a long time, it's impossible for me to muster any sympathy for people who pull stunts like that.

I will assume the "you" means A Nobody. I don't think he cares about any future support if he is disconnecting himself from his past. He is probably going to just join the long line of blatantly obvious restarts that no one can pin down who they are (they should be dubbed "Aitians" or some similar word).

Maybe he thinks he's disconnecting himself from his past, but he's not. I imagine his new account will be detected very quickly, as soon as he pops up on AfD. It's sad.

Don't bet on it, toots.

What's even more sad, is when you post clueless nonsense like that---
with a straight face.

AN is ALREADY socking. He never stopped socking. And you'll probably never know what
his sock accounts are---until and unless someone here points them out.

Get real. He always does the same thing. This has been going on for a long time. The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught.

Notice that no one answered my question here. Either they don't feel the question merits a response or else there is no good answer to it.