QUOTE(ulsterman @ Mon 31st May 2010, 9:23pm)
By definition, a bureaucrat is someone who has been an admin for a while and still enjoys the overwhelming endorsement of the community (or at least those who bother to vote). That gives bureaucrats an aura of status far beyond their actual powers.
Eh, that's spoken like someone who seeks positions of power on various projects
and accounts just for the fun of it (omg that aura).
This "beyond one's actual powers" bullshit really should be deconstructed. Any tasks not enumerated on
this page belong to whatever users volunteer to perform them. Some people have developed theories more restrictive in terms of who should (exclusively) be in charge of what, but their starry-eyed essays do not make it so.
Moreover they haven't figured out a self-contained way to address the issue of abuse. All they do is take away user-rights not intimately related to the task. Or when that would be too harsh they just let it go.
Or maybe they say the 3-revert rule applies, then make it 0RR for people outside their little group, unless they agree with you, this time only, etc.
QUOTE(ulsterman @ Tue 1st June 2010, 11:27am)
And on the whole, I think most people would agree that the bureaucrats are rarely if ever the admins that cause the most problems.
Except on wikiquote.