Did we discuss anywhere here the $2 million gift to the WMF made by an anonymous donor, announced recently via the (late) October 2010 dashboard report by Erik "non-violent child pornography does no harm" Moeller?

In your experience, how common are anonymous donations -- of that magnitude -- to any organization? What sort of controversy or attention is the donor seeking to avoid? Will that donor ever be identified (such as on a Form 990 to the IRS)?

My guess would be that an anonymous donation of that size is rather unusual, especially for an "educational charity", but not unprecedented. It would have to be a very, very well-heeled benefactor, I imagine. Or perhaps I should say "beneficiary".

It's just a guess, mind you.

No, non-profit foundations are not required to disclose their donors.


In any funding campaign one typically secures as much as 50% of the anticipated total before the campaign is publicly announced, through this sort of "keystone" donors. In most organizations, this donation would have been announced toward the end, but not at the end. If course, in the same way there are "soft starts" (or "silent periods") at the beginning, some organizations have a "soft close" and continue the campaign for some time after it concludes, especially if it generated momentum.


That is a very interesting question. Anonymous donations like this are often from insiders, from those who might be perceived as having a conflict of interest, or from people who do not wish to be associated with the cause. They are usually from individuals (as opposed to foundations, who do have to report their giving on 990s). A campaign will usually want to publicize a big donation like this one, so the anonymity and timing -- like the rest of Wikipedia -- are a little weird.

Someone must really NOT value their money.

If it is ever leaked, it'd be Wikipediareview.com or a similar entity, I would imagine.