I am anarchist prisoner from Russia in Amerikan gulag. Thanx
a lot for your paper, even though I disagree with a lot in
it, it's important to remain oneself in these hard times
without becoming reactionary. In solidarity, fighting for my
idea of better world.

VolodyA! V. Mozhenkov
Federal Correctional Institution Elkton
Lisbon, Ohio

VolodyA! V Mozhenkov, 06429-046 DB, FCI Elkton,
Enslaved by USA, LISBON OH 444 32-0010 UNITED STATES

Name Register # Age-Race-Sex Release Date Location
VLADIMIR MOZHENKOV 06429-046 30-White-M 10-04-2002 RELEASED

Porn Man Gets Jail

HELENA, Montana (AP) - A Russian man has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for downloading pornographic pictures - some involving children - to a computer at a local college.

Vladimir Mozhenkov was arrested last December after federal agents traced more than 37 pornographic images posted on the Internet to one of Carroll College's computer labs.

Mozhenkov admitted to having child pornography on several diskettes and using computers at the college to distribute child pornography.

At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography.
He faces deportation after serving his sentence.

... At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography.

He faces deportation after serving his sentence.

Anyone know where he's editing from nowadays?

I'm surprised that the Mainstream Press hasn't picked up on a convicted child pornographer, expelled from the United States, being allowed to ply his trade on a 503c funded servers in Florida myself.

I'm surprised that no one at WP has jumped on this yet. The longer they wait, the worse it will look when it hits Fox News....

::::::: The double standards of people amaze me. "This image is of poor quality" is a good argument not to use this particular image, but it's not an argument to use no image, and since there are no better images currently, there's simply no argument as far as i can see. And yes, Wikipedia SHOULDNOTBECENSORED, but it's a much broader argument here. What is at stake is whether or not one chooses to report on everything that is encyclopaedic or only on those things which are safe and approved by some PR committee. I believe that we shouldn't stress over how Wikipedia looks like, after all everybody is Wikipedia, if somebody comes here and sees that the image doesn't look good (which i think is false, it's a reasonable quality image) they have all the right in the world to create a better one. The fact that it's a hoax, however, makes a real video unlikely (i wouldn't advise it), so it may actually be quite good to have '''this''' animation. [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>User:Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 17:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=476150531

Good find, Tarantino, thanks.

Ditto, thanks for the good work yet again.

Pedophilia (or paedophilia, originally Greek παιδοφιλια; paidophilia) is a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. While the exact definition varies by context, it commonly refers to the medical definition defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. The correct term for an attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.
Those who meet the criteria set above are classed as pedophiles. Common usage do not follow the strict medical definitions of an adult or teen who is attracted to prepubescent children, but often refers to any adult who is attracted to, or has sexual contact with, any person under the age of consent, or the age of majority (often 16-18 in most western countries).
In many societies and cultures, the term pedophile is highly stigmatized and represents an image of an evil, callous monster. This spurs many self-identified pedophiles to adopt names such as boylover, minor-attracted adult, girllover, and childlover, among others, to assist in differentiating themselves and their values from this stereotype.
While pedophiles have made great contributions to past societies, their influence is often ignored or their attraction to children is greatly played down.
One of the dearest fantasy held in the paedophile sub-culture is that of the fantasy island - the secluded island community where paedophiles and children roam free, enjoying total sexual freedom. The idea behind this fantasy is the suggestion that away from the oppressive teachings of these organised religions, those who feel a sexual attraction towards the pre-pubescent can indulge their basest desires and, in doing so, also achieve some form of enlightenment... that the freedom to establish their much maligned and negated altruism will result in some kind of mass overhaul of opinion amongst the general population.
However, that's why it's called a fantasy. Because it'll never happen. The irrational hatred felt towards paedophiles is something that few are prepared to even acknowledge as being irrational, let alone try to combat.
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?titl...lia&oldid=33996

Seconded. And here is his article on 'child love' for Anarchopedia (which even the anarchists eventually deleted).

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

Why is Wikipedia Review doing so much of Wikipedia's dirty work???

tarantino, how you tracked it down, if I may ask please?

These anarchists IDed him four years ago, but the internet collective seemed to have forgotten it until now.

Reading through all this I got one question:

Why is Wikipedia Review doing so much of Wikipedia's dirty work???

Paolo, Beta M and that's just recent, going back further Essjay, Mantanmoreland etc.

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

I have been blocked

This is rubbish, i have been blocked for "unacceptable behaviour. Have emailed user with a more detailed reason" by User:Geni. I have checked my e-mail, there's an e-mail from that user accusing me of distributing child pornography and suggesting that it is linked to Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sukumizu_Girl.jpg. I believe that this is an attempt to stack the votes. The interesting thing is that in the meanwhile the DR has been closed as a clear keep.

After reading the e-mail again i have come to the conclusion that this is an attempt to get me to disclose my identity. To be fair here's the contents of the e-mail:

geniice@gmail.com
I believe this to be you:
http://sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=13283
that being the case your involvement with
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...kumizu_Girl.jpg
Is unacceptable. given the issues involved I won't be posting a public block reason. If you wish to appeal you may do so via email or on your talkpage or since I have blocked you on en as well you may appeal to arbcom.
However I will forward my evidence to anyone you appeal to or if you appear on your talk page I will post it there.

I am also from Russia. What i am not doing is i'm not distributing child pornography, i am distributing diagrams and photos. Apparently the admin didn't know how to check this. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 03:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I wouldn't call it "their dirty work", so much as I would call it "public embarrassment". If WR people really
WERE doing their dirty work, these little problems would be communicated to the Wiki-Fools privately,
and the cover-up would be done quietly. That's how they want it.

Instead, by having people post the atrocities on WR, the Fools look all the more like fools. In public.
Plus, I document the whole thing for posterity (think about a book). Instead of being just
another quietly-covered-up disaster, it adds to the pile of public disasters and embarrassments.

Geni is (IMO) an evil little shit. You should see his block record. He's a homeopathy freak, and why the
pro-science WP contingent tolerates him is a bizarre mystery. He's been there since early 2004,
so he's part of the "landscape". Like a sewer treatment plant that leaks into the river occasionally.

I belive he has a conviction for downloading child pornography from 2000. The evidence involves his real name but here's a link to where he posted the evidence onwiki before it was deleted: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...000304&unhide=1

The revision which was deleted was deleted without me asking for it, i don't mind if it'll be undeleted.

Note the immediate cry of 'harassment' http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...&oldid=68003918 .

I don't care about what they've done off-wiki [...] --Prosfilaes (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Rather more up my street is that Free Speech is invoked as well. That should get the unthinking mob going around nodding wildly.

Censorship, free speech, harassment - and nobody will consider that the guy is openly using Wikimedia to promote his unusual personal views on child pornography.

If he was smart he would have encrypted the data on his hard disk, and he may have chosen to do time rather than provide the key.

My guess is that he ran a Freenet node and child porn may or may not have landed on it, but he got done for it anyway. Whether or not he is into child pornography is by the by from a legal perspective if it was found on his hard disks. If he was smart he would have encrypted the data on his hard disk, and he may have chosen to do time rather than provide the key.

This does not sound good:
"It does not matter if you are Anonymous in USA or a Buddhist in China, whether your sexuality is criminalised by “your” government or you speak out against crimes of ‘your” government ..."

Author: My name is VolodyA! V Anarhist, i am politically anarchist, ethically vegan, spiritually buddhist, religiously agnostic, artistically poetic, sexually perverted, and queer gender-wise. But this podcast is not about myself, but rather about my ideas.

I've never heard of Wikipedia Review before; but what what i'm reading now it looks like an awful group of people.
VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 12:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Only a passing comment but W Review is the pits - why any intelligent person would want to be there I have no idea. For those UK based it makes our gutter press look quite reasonable...! --Herby talk thyme 12:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

So to review: A major defender of the porn on Wikipedia commons is a convicted child pornographer, who makes videos about the unfair persecution of pedophiles by "the man." The convicted child pornographer has a voice in attempts to change image policy surrounding pornography, its filtering, and the protection of children. The convicted child pornographer is unblocked, and this forum is attacked by other Wikipedia Commons/Administrators as a "horrible site" for... pointing out that he's a convicted child pornographer.

Do I have this right?

Dan, are you going to publish this in the press, or am I, or both of us?

So to review: A major defender of the porn on Wikipedia commons is a convicted child pornographer, who makes videos about the unfair persecution of pedophiles by "the man." The convicted child pornographer has a voice in attempts to change image policy surrounding pornography, its filtering, and the protection of children. The convicted child pornographer is unblocked, and this forum is attacked by other Wikipedia Commons/Administrators as a "horrible site" for... pointing out that he's a convicted child pornographer.

Do I have this right?

Rather more up my street is that Free Speech is invoked as well. That should get the unthinking mob going around nodding wildly.

Censorship, free speech, harassment - and nobody will consider that the guy is openly using Wikimedia to promote his unusual personal views on child pornography.

Note from tarantinos link the Anarchists drummed him out pretty quick.
http://libcom.org/forums/libcommunity/anar...d-more-06122007

Do I get to use this?

Anarchists have rules after all.

Carbuncle, you are going down the wrong track. In the end, the issue for Wikimedia (wearing a Wiki hat) is not who he is, but what he did on Wikimedia, what his fellow apologists are doing, and what tracks have been covered up. They are using the "what happens off Wiki, stays off Wiki" line but Genil clearly is saying that the line was crossed, and the evidence of this has been deleted, and Beta_M is even saying "Yes, I did these things, where is the problem?"

Ah, but that isn't what Beta M is saying on Commons. It is what I would expect him to say, but he seems to be saying that he is not the person charged, which I find surprising. Then again, you may be saying that his activities on-wiki are enough to merit a ban, which is a harder case to make.

Ah, but that isn't what Beta M is saying on Commons. It is what I would expect him to say, but he seems to be saying that he is not the person charged, which I find surprising. Then again, you may be saying that his activities on-wiki are enough to merit a ban, which is a harder case to make.

While still in prison i've started a zine of poetry... Well, i've just put out 6th issue, and it's mostly too large to spread around through paper form for me. But at this address you can get a .pdf of it and print it out or just read it:
http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id...8&group=webcast
Also i can always use more poetry for the future issues, that can be either mailed to me or e-mailed (msg me for that info).
In addition to all this plz check out the web page that i've set up for the zine for now (its at When Gendarme Sleeps (http://gendarmesleeps.narod.ru) ) and let me know of any ideas that you have. Any links that you think i can add and anything else.
Free your mind and seek the truth. VolodyA! V Anarhist 08-04-2003, 09:41 AM http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/i...hp/t-21720.html

In the prison i was in Ad Seg ment that you have not been found "True" on your infraction. While in there you are housed in the same part of the SHU as are PC (Protective Custody) people. After you have had the hearing and were given a "sentence" you are moved to D Sed (Disciplinary Segregation) for a turm that was decided on at the hearing. After D Seg you go back to Ad Seg until the bunk in your unit is empty and you can go back to the general population. Also sometimes Ad Seg was used for the transit inmates, especially for those who are of different security level than the prison and they sit there until the transport picks them up. And even sometimes when you arrive at the prison you are placed in Ad Seg, just to be sure. Like they put me there for 2 days to make sure that i wasn't suicidal (the SHU will make you suicidal if you aren't)...
Well i think that's all i have to say. Free your mind and seek the truth. ...............................VolodyA! V Anarhist PS The prison i was talking about is a federal prison in OH (FCI Elkton) http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/i...hp/t-14339.html

Fellow, persons,

Yesterday it was known to me that Freedom Collective is considering to ban me from Freedom
Bookshop because of allegations that i support of childlove movement (sometimes referred
to ask 'paedophilia advocacy'). Because of the content of the e-mail that was sent to me i
believe that it started from an individual from one of the forums that i was recently
banned from (VF.net). I was banned from there after voicing my opinions on the issues of
ageism and childlove movement.

I was requested to clarify my stance on the issue for the Freedom Collective and i believe
that i have done so last night, here is the extract from what i've written:

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To tell you the truth, i don't really know what i believe about the childlove issue in
particular. My relevant beliefs on the issue can be shortly described as following:
1. I believe in freedom of speech.
2. I totally oppose ageism in any shape of form (even when it tries to hide itself as
"protecting our children").
3. I believe that childlove movement members are not allowed to express their views in an
open to discussion forum.
4. I believe that the only way to figure out what childlove movement is all about is to
have an open discussion about the issue.
5. I do not believe in "protectionism". (It isn't directly related to childlove, but many
people confuse this particular belief of mine with lack of support to the victims of
abuse. This is *not* the case.)
6. I did not, nor have any plans to advocate childlove movement through London Anarchist
Forum.
7. I would have tried to discuss the issue to see what people think if given an
opportunity before, but now i am not sure if i would even do that.

Please note that by childlove i by no means refer to child rapists or child molesters. I
am in complete opposition to any form of non-consensual relationships, whether or not they
include children or not, and whether or not they include sex or not.

Let me make it clear:
I am not now nor have been since my politics began developing supporting non-consentual
relationships.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've also voiced my criticism of any type of "no platform policy", while saying that i
respect Freedom Collective's freedom to implement such a policy within their own collective.

The reason why i'm writing this e-mail is because i am afraid that some sort of campaign
has been launched against me, with the goal of tracking down political groups that i am
involved with and "helping them" to ban me. While i do believe that i have nothing to hide
about my politics, even when those politics are unpopular, i am trying to anticipate
further occurrences of the "smear campaign".

Free your mind and seek the truth.
- Volodya

P.S. I hope that Freedom will decide not to ban me, and i will see you all on the 31st.

Volodya is totally opposed to non-consensual sexual relationships between children and adults:

The following probably reflects Beta_M's views on consent:

http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?titl...ation&diff=3916

Beta_M supports the "freedom" to have child-adult sexual relationships, but he doesn't support rape.

I'm not sure if the latter is Volodya's own words - it says "BoyWiki copy". His own words are damning enough.

Note that the website he mentions www.whengendarmesleeps.org/main.html is also linked to on his user page EN user page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=11543826

I've spent 2 years and nine months in prison for posession
of child porn. And the fact that there was none of it on my
computer when it was confiscated didn't matter; trust me when
you are arrested for something like that you need a miracle not
to be found guilty (unless you are a judge or a cop).