Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 2012 CheckUser and Oversight appointments
> Wikimedia Discussion > Bureaucracy
Michaeldsuarez
ArbCom is in the process of appointing new CheckUser and Oversighters. Here are the candidates:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...appointments/CU

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...appointments/OS

The public community commenting period will cease at the end of June 28th:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=498569378

Let's hear some thoughts about the candidates.
-DS-
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 21st June 2012, 12:41pm) *
Let's hear some thoughts about the candidates.


Or, more likely, the sound of crickets chirping.
Michaeldsuarez
QUOTE(-DS- @ Thu 21st June 2012, 7:22am) *

QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 21st June 2012, 12:41pm) *
Let's hear some thoughts about the candidates.


Or, more likely, the sound of crickets chirping.


The least that I can do is to inform lurkers.

Disclaimer: Since CheckUsers and Oversighters are being appointed instead of elected, I do not see this as canvassing.
Fusion
I have never heard of any of the Checkuser candidates. We have a saying at home, if you hear silence at least it is not bad news. No doubt were they too awful we would know of them.

Of the Oversighters I know that Tiptoety has a poor reputation in some quarters. I have heard a trace of mentifisto bu tnothing too bad. Again, of the others I know nothing.

culeaker
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 21st June 2012, 6:24pm) *

Disclaimer: Since CheckUsers and Oversighters are being appointed instead of elected, I do not see this as canvassing.

I'm not sure about that. RfA and RfB are not elections, in theory at least; they are discussions and the closing bureaucrat sums up the discussion. However, coming here and encouraging participation in an RfA or RfB would clearly be canvassing.

QUOTE(Fusion @ Thu 21st June 2012, 8:16pm) *

Of the Oversighters I know that Tiptoety has a poor reputation in some quarters.

I've heard rumours to that effect.
Mortimer
QUOTE(culeaker @ Fri 22nd June 2012, 9:50pm) *

QUOTE(Fusion @ Thu 21st June 2012, 8:16pm) *

Of the Oversighters I know that Tiptoety has a poor reputation in some quarters.

I've heard rumours to that effect.

Yes, I think we all have! laugh.gif
Fusion
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Sat 14th July 2012, 12:39pm) *

So this Tiptoety did not get it which must be good, no?
Mr.Treason II
Who Are The Candidatez?

One must be responsible for his actions and his (ab)/use of power. I would nominate the following if I were in charge:

* Herschelkrustofsky

* Cognition

* Cla68

* Rootology

* Ecoleetage

* A Nobody

* Alison

I feel that they are *RESPONSIBLE* people.
Fusion
QUOTE(Mr.Treason II @ Tue 17th July 2012, 6:09pm) *

I feel that they are *RESPONSIBLE* people.

For what things are they responsible? blink.gif
Jay
QUOTE(Mr.Treason II @ Tue 17th July 2012, 6:09pm) *

One must be responsible for his actions and his (ab)/use of power. I would nominate the following if I were in charge:

* Herschelkrustofsky

* Cognition

* Cla68

* Rootology

* Ecoleetage

* A Nobody

* Alison

I feel that they are *RESPONSIBLE* people.

If you were really in charge you could just promote them unilaterally.

Certainly I'd support Ecoleetage and possibly Cla68. I have severe doubts about some of the others.

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.