QUOTE(Joel Leyden @ Thu 8th March 2007, 4:23pm)
Honest, open, brave, dedicated and intelligent.
Have I missed any adjectives?
Sexy?No matter, though... But I'd still like to
thank you for showing some much-appreciated self-restraint in posting only a link to the press release this time, Joel! The last time, well, we had a little trouble over it, as you may recall.
I'm probably overstepping by making suggestions for the sake of clarity, but there are two sentences I would change somewhat:
QUOTE
Wikipedia, which has been criticized by almost every academic institution and leading news organizations including Reuters, USA Today and the BBC as one of the least reliable sources on the Internet (except for the latest clothing and hair styles of Britney Spears) lists thousands of entries including high schools and the characters of Pokemon, but deems Kinnernet as not notable.
That should read something like, "Wikipedia, criticized as one of the least reliable sources of information on the Internet by a multitude of academic institutions and leading news organizations including Reuters, USA Today and the BBC, contains thousands of entries for high schools, Pokemon characters, and Britney Spears' latest hairstyles - but deems Kinnernet as not sufficiently notable."
QUOTE
More stories on Wikipedia thanks to section 230 of the Federal Communications Decency Act (CDA), which became law in 1996, Wikipedia is most likely safe from legal liability for libel, regardless of how long an inaccurate article stays on the site.
This one is tougher, but I'd change it to "Under Section 230 of the U.S. Federal Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA), Wikipedia claims to be protected from legal liability for libelous statements and claims made on their website, regardless of how long such material has remained there."
Other than that, bravo! Well done!