QUOTE(Thomas Dalton @ 20:30 UTC, 14 Mar 2007)
I think this is an example of where process should be followed even when it seems pointless. If we don't follow it then the banning policy is actually "Banned users are not allowed to make useless edits.", rather than "Banned users are not allowed to edit." The former is not a useful policy (it basically makes bans a form of probation).
All edits by banned users should be deleted, if they're useful, they can be remade by someone else who can take responsibility for them.
Source. Thomas Dalton, Wickering List, 20:30 UTC, 14 Mar 2007
Another fantastic — and I do mean fantastic — feature of Wikipsychopathology is thinking that Banning People makes them Cease To Exist. Actually believing that you can wish the world away is a classic textbook example of an Infantile Fantasy (IF), but finding it in a person not wearing diapers (UK:nappies?) is a serious symptom of retrograde development. Of course, I don't really have the WP:ATT to prove that they aren't wearing diapers ...
Jonny