QUOTE(SqueakBox @ Mon 16th April 2007, 11:11pm)
Thanks for that. When I told DennyColt the same thing he claimed he already knew about it (which surprised me as I only found out myself after asking for help in searching at the tech desk on the VP) but to be honest I would expect a more mature response from yourself.
I guess I just assumed everyone knew you could change the parameters in the URL string manually, but hey, whatever... Still, what do you mean by "more mature response"? Are you saying that preferring not to concatenate multiple shorter results pages is immature? I suppose in a way, it might be... I hadn't really considered it before.
Meanwhile, "Denny" hasn't appeared on Wikipedia in over three days. (You can almost smell the improvement...) One of the
last things he posted was to his user page:
QUOTE
Anyone who links to, supports, endorses, advertises, or promotes attack/hate sites that seek to hurt or "out" the real life identities of Wikipedians and that defends the right to link to such vile, hateful material is in my opinion of questionable morality.
Well, at least he didn't include those of us who actually participate in such sites, eh? Of course, we're not a "hate site," even if some of us detest some of the things they do. Still, I've gotten into the habit of stating my own versions of these kinds of demagogue-pronouncements:
Anyone who links to, supports, endorses, advertises, writes articles for, edits, or promotes attack/hate sites such as Wikipedia that seek to publish real-life personal information of private individuals in a pseudo-objective fashion, over their clear objections, and in such a way as to allow anyone with an IP address to anonymously alter that information, and that defends the right to link to such a vile, hateful website is in my opinion totally and completely immoral.Trust me, I can keep this up for
years if I have to!