Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: General Discussion
Wikipedia Review > Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
  1. The Empire Strikes Back!! (23 replies)
  2. Close encounters of the Third Kind (23 replies)
  3. I've joined WikiNews! (6 replies)
  4. Final wikiabuse topic (99 replies)
  5. All hail the new flesh (63 replies)
  6. Wikipedia ignores username violations for User:Jack Cox (10 replies)
  7. Thou dost now stand accused as "SOCK" (11 replies)
  8. Poor Baby !!! (10 replies)
  9. The Cult of the Amateur (1 replies)
  10. Critique Of Abusive Reason (12 replies)
  11. Kevin1243 (5 replies)
  12. Four Out Five Wikipediots Chew Their Gums (0 replies)
  13. Why are SlimVirgin, Crum375, and Jayjg removing all mention of whether people are Jewish? (3 replies)
  14. WR has a blog! (2 replies)
  15. I claim, you verify ... sucker. (8 replies)
  16. How To Recognize A Pseudowiki (PW) (6 replies)
  17. Wiki Abuse Abuse (65 replies)
  18. How to report checkuser results (1 replies)
  19. Definition Of A Cult (8 replies)
  20. Naked Lunch 2.0 (8 replies)
  21. Wikipedia falsely bans a GREAT editor as a sockpuppet of myself (part 2) (27 replies)
  22. Spoiler Tags being completely eliminated (4 replies)
  23. What Have We Learned From The Failure Of WikiAbuse.Com (WAC) ? (62 replies)
  24. Dubya A, Dubya B, Dubya C, …, Dubya P, … (9 replies)
  25. Starting your own Wikipedia-style project (17 replies)
  26. It's time for Wikipedia to crack down on scrapers (13 replies)
  27. Is Wikipedia running a censorship board? (3 replies)
  28. Wikipedians and PRTistas Vote to Remove Comic Critical of Wikipedia (10 replies)
  29. The Ins And Outs Of Personal Identity Censored Data (2 replies)
  30. Categories Of Wikipedian Abuse ¤ COWA-BONGA (2 replies)
  31. Diverting Internet Gossip Dress Up Game (DIGDUG) (1 replies)
  32. Announcing The Birth Of WP:TAOOTSA (12 replies)
  33. New WMF General Counsel (2 replies)
  34. Content of Article Deleted on WA? (0 replies)
  35. Changing Rules after Election Starts (0 replies)
  36. Systemic Abuse (12 replies)
  37. Built In, Pervasive, And Systemic Abuse (BIPASA) (0 replies)
  38. Wikiphrenetic Working Wacation (WWW) (5 replies)
  39. Sunblock Lotions, Notions, And Potions (0 replies)
  40. Mediawiki/MySQL savvy people (28 replies)
  41. The Weasels In The Chicken House (TWITCH) Wiki (38 replies)
  42. The Oldest Living Transparent Window On The WP Scene (2 replies)
  43. The Non-Innie-Versus-Outie Discussion Of WikiAbuse (23 replies)
  44. This looks interesting (1 replies)
  45. Cbrown1023 could be in a certain amount of trouble (24 replies)
  46. WikiPariahs And Personae Non Gratae (WP:PNG) (3 replies)
  47. Kate McAuliffe?? (3 replies)
  48. Urbane Dictionary : Wikipedance (1 replies)
  49. More chatlogs (2 replies)
  50. Wikiabuse.com (81 replies)
  51. IRL Admin Accountability Project (3 replies)
  52. ArbCom's proposed decision on BLPs (24 replies)
  53. TIME, Jimbo Wales, and Democracy (9 replies)
  54. Twin Mothers Of Different Suns (0 replies)
  55. GDFL problem? (15 replies)
  56. POLL: Do you believe in the Wikipedia concept? (9 replies)
  57. Internet Defamation Suit Tests Online Anonymity (0 replies)
  58. Wikipediot Idnetity Crisis (10 replies)
  59. "Outing" Wikipedians (33 replies)
  60. Sheldon Rampton on WikiEn-l (12 replies)
  61. Wikipedia Watch hivemind tally? (13 replies)
  62. Mormon propaganda (9 replies)
  63. Bully reverters vs. civil people (1 replies)
  64. My Sock Puppet Army Can Beat Up Your Sock Puppet Army (10 replies)
  65. Conservapedia. Reports from Todd Larsen (13 replies)
  66. Wikigroaning (11 replies)
  67. Wikiality wiki (5 replies)
  68. Wikipedia traffic (10 replies)
  69. Hein Severloh (4 replies)
  70. Japanese Wikitruth? (0 replies)
  71. Citizendium and Marketing (2 replies)
  72. Surprised this edit hasn't been oversighted (3 replies)
  73. The Future (18 replies)
  74. Moved: POLL!!!!!! What group spreads the most bias in Wikipedia? (-- replies)
  75. Conflicting Wikipedia philosophies (1 replies)
  76. Random vandalism lasting weeks at a time (9 replies)
  77. Wikipedia is not a role-playing game (4 replies)
  78. Organizing, Community Building and Web 2.0 (6 replies)
  79. Private person vs. Public person (6 replies)
  80. Wikipedia : Truth -> Verifiability -> Plausible Deniability (12 replies)
  81. 6th CD MN GOP Chair Edits Politician's Wikipedia Page (5 replies)
  82. Anyone else having trouble reaching Wikipedia? (2 replies)
  83. Did Google stop indexing Talk pages? (11 replies)
  84. Where Wikipedia gets policy from (1 replies)
  85. Mass blockage of editors including me (43 replies)
  86. Chain of command (6 replies)
  87. The Wikien List Is A BADSITE (20 replies)
  88. WIKIPEDIA SCANDAL ROCKS CHILE’S SENATE (0 replies)
  89. New policy. Delete first, then discuss it. (6 replies)
  90. Vandalism team stretched too thin? (9 replies)
  91. Wikipedia acquisition? (1 replies)
  92. Tony the Marine and Tony Sidaway (2 replies)
  93. Hell froze over, but not for long (9 replies)
  94. GFDL Nonsense (2 replies)
  95. A Scientologist and a Wikipedian walk into a bar... (1 replies)
  96. Jimmy Wales on Colbert Report (10 replies)
  97. Ceterum censeo Wikipedium esse delendam! (9 replies)
  98. A Wikipedia Bias (21 replies)
  99. Self-murder for spammers (5 replies)
  100. Visualizing Wikipedia Power Struggles? (1 replies)
  101. Why the inline citation fetish creates bad articles (23 replies)
  102. This is George Washington on Wikipedia (4 replies)
  103. Wikipedia editors... (4 replies)
  104. Federal appeals court undermines Section 230 (22 replies)
  105. 30,000 Posts !!! (2 replies)
  106. The term paper test (28 replies)
  107. A burst of Radiance (16 replies)
  108. Wikipedia - the byword for crap (0 replies)
  109. Noindexing of talk pages (4 replies)
  110. A matter of historical interest (9 replies)
  111. A very good article about why experts leave WP (8 replies)
  112. Oh dear. (47 replies)
  113. Wikipedia Is A Tablog (1 replies)
  114. Better Names for Wikipedia (27 replies)
  115. The latest in BLP (27 replies)
  116. Ist das WikiFascism? (28 replies)
  117. Wikipedia logins, IP and open source, brainstorming... (4 replies)
  118. The problem of Wikipedia is solved (18 replies)
  119. WP:BADMOVIES (7 replies)
  120. New discussion started on BLP (45 replies)
  121. Jimmy Wales to play Somey in new WP movie! (23 replies)
  122. Wikipedia Signpost: How much independence? (99 replies)
  123. Wikis Of Mind Destruction (1 replies)
  124. Nick Carr nails Wikipedia (and Citizendium) (4 replies)
  125. What is http://www.wikiphrenia.com ? (6 replies)
  126. Web 2.0 with Eric Feola: Why Wikipedia Sucks (2 replies)
  127. My legal strategy (22 replies)
  128. Concrete evidence that Wikipedia libel does indeed have "real life" implications (2 replies)
  129. New essay: "Wikipedia is in the real world" (28 replies)
  130. From the dregs of Wiki-en (3 replies)
  131. Times letter (18 replies)
  132. Current Events and Wikipedia (30 replies)
  133. Change in BLP policy? (5 replies)
  134. Jimbo on NPR's "Fresh Air" (13 replies)
  135. Musical Linguist removes libelous subpage (2 replies)
  136. A brilliant idea (12 replies)
  137. Wales calls Seth Finkelstein a "troll" (14 replies)
  138. The Encyclopaedia Britannica (2 replies)
  139. Crookes sues Wikipedia (6 replies)
  140. Q: Lawsuits and Usenet? (9 replies)
  141. CheckUser improvements (4 replies)
  142. Lawsuit filed against Wikipedia & Google (8 replies)
  143. User talk page locked (9 replies)
  144. Wales suggests "day of reflection" for VT ... (8 replies)
  145. Police, promotions, and paranoia (12 replies)
  146. HiveMind: 404 Not Found (25 replies)
  147. Please Support, a study about Wikipedia (16 replies)
  148. Seigenthaler gave a speech yesterday (7 replies)
  149. Q: Why not Citizendium? (15 replies)
  150. Wikipedia's being mean to us! (68 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.