Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: General Discussion
Wikipedia Review > Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
  1. Wikitruth on notability (0 replies)
  2. New articles on Wikitruth: Everyking, Brad Patrick (4 replies)
  3. Wikipedia Sunni Islam bias (14 replies)
  4. WikiTruth: "Banned users deserve to be banned" (10 replies)
  5. Dissecting Wikitruth (2 replies)
  6. Wikitruth.info now blacklisted (5 replies)
  7. Raul654 Threatens To BlackList Wikitruth.Info (0 replies)
  8. Latest from Andrew Orlowski (18 replies)
  9. I sent a fax to Wikipedia's lawyer (21 replies)
  10. Spam Blacklist - a special case (7 replies)
  11. Q&A with TheRegister.com's Andrew Orlowski (8 replies)
  12. Stop me if you've heard this (8 replies)
  13. danah boyd (2 replies)
  14. Dictator Jimbo seizes more power (WP:OFFICE) (41 replies)
  15. Help me understand the cabal (18 replies)
  16. Today's atrocious featured article (25 replies)
  17. How to contact Wikitruth (0 replies)
  18. More Pellegrini-style "spam" (0 replies)
  19. Wikitruth.info now has email (0 replies)
  20. Note on wikitruth.info (5 replies)
  21. GFDL workarounds (0 replies)
  22. Which will be Wikipedia's Alexa global traffic rank at its maximum and when will it be reached? (3 replies)
  23. Erik Moeller/Eloquence Indefinitely Blocked And Desysopped By Wikimedia Office (3 replies)
  24. Permanent Protections (6 replies)
  25. Wikitruth poll (9 replies)
  26. Wikipedia's bureaucracy = cause of problems? (41 replies)
  27. NPOV (8 replies)
  28. Wikitruth.info articles for deletion (6 replies)
  29. Wikipedia down yet again (1 replies)
  30. Wikipedia categories (4 replies)
  31. A Chronology (8 replies)
  32. No Censorship on Wikipedia policy - rejected (3 replies)
  33. Jimbo Wales Calls WikiTruth.info a "Hoax" (5 replies)
  34. Jimmy Wales interview in The Register (1 replies)
  35. Racist article [[Race and intelligence]] (15 replies)
  36. Wikipedia on search engines (0 replies)
  37. The Spam Blacklist (15 replies)
  38. wikitruth.info (6 replies)
  39. {{expert}} template (3 replies)
  40. A speech titled "The Great Failure of Wikipedia" (1 replies)
  41. New article about Wikipedia's abuse (8 replies)
  42. A couple of news items... (12 replies)
  43. "Assume good faith" and other games people play (11 replies)
  44. Tbeatty is a troll (1 replies)
  45. You would find this funny. (2 replies)
  46. A clueless administrator (6 replies)
  47. A new Wikipedia critic does a slam-dunk (26 replies)
  48. The sum of all human knowledge? (18 replies)
  49. WP:CABAL (3 replies)
  50. Libel and No legal threats (6 replies)
  51. Raul censors [[Criticism of Wikipedia]] (14 replies)
  52. Wikipedia down (4 replies)
  53. fukn absurd (6 replies)
  54. Suggestion: Username blacklist (8 replies)
  55. Wikipedia Review censored, consensus ignored yet again (16 replies)
  56. Constructive Criticism (27 replies)
  57. How do you like my new legal threat? (54 replies)
  58. Jimbo Wales Calls People Who Oppose The Deletion Of The Controverial Image In The Lolicon Article "Pedophiles" and "Trolls" (28 replies)
  59. Template:User review undeletion attempt (25 replies)
  60. [[Criticism of Wikipedia]] protected (3 replies)
  61. Wikipedia (14 replies)
  62. Circumvent Wikimedia Spam Blacklist (8 replies)
  63. A specific example of Wikipedia's bias (2 replies)
  64. [[Wikipedia Watch]] (2 replies)
  65. Nature responds to Britannica (4 replies)
  66. What are the contents of Wikipedia? (15 replies)
  67. 180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing (6 replies)
  68. Wikipedia Review on meta (11 replies)
  69. April Fools Mayhem (4 replies)
  70. Has Jimbo lost it entirely? (23 replies)
  71. Spam Blacklist affects other projects (6 replies)
  72. Unnatural Acts Of Nature (12 replies)
  73. Throwing a spanner in the works (15 replies)
  74. wikipedia implements stable version (1 replies)
  75. WikiCities Grows (6 replies)
  76. Why be a Wikipedia admin? (18 replies)
  77. Register letters page - quite funny (1 replies)
  78. Talk pages (6 replies)
  79. Removing pages from history (8 replies)
  80. wikipedia's original research (13 replies)
  81. wikiSphere (4 replies)
  82. Fundraising (10 replies)
  83. Leaving Wikipedia and Wikipedia Review (9 replies)
  84. Request for a silly revert war (17 replies)
  85. Should Daniel Brandt have a Wikipedia article? (10 replies)
  86. Registation secretly refused (17 replies)
  87. IRC Stats (11 replies)
  88. My #1 Problem With Wikipedia (7 replies)
  89. BBC unloads on Wikipedia (1 replies)
  90. Brittanica Nature response (14 replies)
  91. Wikipedia April Fools Main Page (2 replies)
  92. Historical Evidence, "Original Research" and "Neutral Point of View" (6 replies)
  93. Wikimedia Foundation: an irresponsible publisher (3 replies)
  94. the cabal... of looove (36 replies)
  95. A parting shot (0 replies)
  96. Funny Username Block (27 replies)
  97. Article in the Bismarck Tribune (2 replies)
  98. how to insert vandalism into wikipedia (16 replies)
  99. Libel against Wikipedia and Jimbo (1 replies)
  100. A New Controversial Wikipedia Bashing Article (10 replies)
  101. RJII (5 replies)
  102. Bonaparte again (0 replies)
  103. Arbitration Committee votes for 2007 (3 replies)
  104. Splash Blocks Ati3414 For Off-Wiki Harassment (2 replies)
  105. wiki community (4 replies)
  106. Bomis Babes (3 replies)
  107. Nibart's blog (3 replies)
  108. WikiCities (22 replies)
  109. More wiki start-ups (2 replies)
  110. Newsvine (2 replies)
  111. Wikinfo and the Port Arthur Massacre article experiment. (2 replies)
  112. Wikipedia admin Daniel Quinlan: "How to Game Wikipedia" (7 replies)
  113. Evil wiki logo (10 replies)
  114. Userbox policy poll (13 replies)
  115. Wikipedia servers caput (15 replies)
  116. Defect in "preview" option in Wikipedia (2 replies)
  117. Wikibooks's Spam Protection (5 replies)
  118. A large wiki collective as a simulation of a state's people (1 replies)
  119. Interstate Charity Regulations and Wikipedia (9 replies)
  120. Google Page Creator (2 replies)
  121. What would happen to Wikipedia development if the Wikimedia Foundation were dissolved? (4 replies)
  122. Wikipedia Review administrators and host: What is your goal when criticizing Wikipedia? (13 replies)
  123. Slashdot on Wikipedia's one millionth article (2 replies)
  124. Why Wikimedia can only be countered with wikis (9 replies)
  125. Archived topic: "Apologies, Exciting News and a Long Post" (0 replies)
  126. Why Wikimedia should be demolished (1 replies)
  127. Archived topic: "Article of the weak (deliberate mis-spelling)" (0 replies)
  128. Archived topic: "this amuses me" (0 replies)
  129. Archived topic: "Lir" (0 replies)
  130. Archived topic: "what a crappy message board" (0 replies)
  131. Archived topic: "Who are wikipedia editors?" (0 replies)
  132. Archived topic: "Wikp. suppresses Hallitube transit initiative..." (0 replies)
  133. Archived topic: "Wikipedia used as source?" (0 replies)
  134. Archived topic: "A paper or an electronic encyclopedia?" (0 replies)
  135. Archived topic: "SF Writer Harlan Ellison against Wikipedia" (0 replies)
  136. Archived topic: "Mr. Seigenthaler Slandered" (0 replies)
  137. Archived topic: "Banned from Wikipedia after a personal attack" (0 replies)
  138. Archived topic: "WikiPedia hierarchy" (0 replies)
  139. Archived topic: "Subtle jab at Wikipedia?" (0 replies)
  140. Archived topic: "Inaccuracies From WikiOp" (0 replies)
  141. Archived topic: "Invitation to the WikiMediaSucks experimental wiki" (0 replies)
  142. Archived topic: "Alex Jones talks about Wikipedia" (0 replies)
  143. Archived topic: "The Wikipedia Review needs a newsfeed" (0 replies)
  144. Archived topic: "Wikipedia on Talk of the Nation 12/6/2005" (0 replies)
  145. Archived topic: "Is Wikipedia an encyclopedia?" (0 replies)
  146. Archived topic: "Wikipedia's not an encyclopedia" (0 replies)
  147. Archived topic: "Anonymous admins?" (0 replies)
  148. Archived topic: "Anonymity vs. Accountability" (0 replies)
  149. Archived topic: "Good site" (0 replies)
  150. Archived topic: "Seigenthaler's libeler is almost identified" (0 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.