Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: General Discussion
Wikipedia Review > Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
  1. Pinned: List of Websites Critical of Wikipedia (33 replies)
  2. Pinned: Welcome to new members (118 replies)
  3. Pinned: Top 10 most viewed WR threads! (52 replies)
  4. Pinned: Larry Sanger: How I started Wikipedia (31 replies)
  5. Pinned: The Wikipedia Timeline (3 replies)
  6. Pinned: When linking to stuff on Wikipedia you want public (1 replies)
  7. Pinned: Welcome to The Wikipedia Review! (0 replies)
  8. Wikipedia Review successor sites (2 replies)
  9. LOOKS LIKE WIKIPEDIA REVIEW IS DEAD. (3 replies)
  10. WIKIPEDIA REVIEW FOREVER! (0 replies)
  11. What happened to this forum? (8 replies)
  12. I'm BACK (5 replies)
  13. We're back! (1 replies)
  14. Purpose of Internet (6 replies)
  15. Wow - 1st time hit by a range block (4 replies)
  16. We're back! (5 replies)
  17. Crowdsourcing at work (1 replies)
  18. The Cult of the Amateur (3 replies)
  19. Wikipedia, Wikimedia, and Bitcoin (2 replies)
  20. How to win a wikipedia ridiculous edit war - post the article here (2 replies)
  21. The purpose of Wikipedia and the other sites (6 replies)
  22. Wikipedia's article on CloudFlare is so lame (3 replies)
  23. Wikipedia Goes All-In on Transphobia (2 replies)
  24. Wikipedia's fate (25 replies)
  25. Letter to UK Charity Commission (274 replies)
  26. Online petition (28 replies)
  27. Is Sue Gardner an Idiot? (23 replies)
  28. We lost (18 replies)
  29. THE TRUE FACE OF WIKIPEIDA AS SEEN BY OTHERS. (6 replies)
  30. Pending Changes will be implemented by December 2012 (7 replies)
  31. Global Bans RfC (2 replies)
  32. Germany to Ban Sex with Animals (4 replies)
  33. Rogue admin writes about rogue admin (1 replies)
  34. Sock Puppetry Destroying Publishing? (3 replies)
  35. Civility Run Amok (0 replies)
  36. PC2012/RfC_3 (0 replies)
  37. PC2012/RfC 1 (4 replies)
  38. I Need a cucumber at the Wikipedia Porn site (3 replies)
  39. Getting the Basics So Wrong (0 replies)
  40. Less Editors, More Money (0 replies)
  41. Jimmy Wales on Linkedin (1 replies)
  42. Verifiability RfC 2012 (6 replies)
  43. Internet Defense League (8 replies)
  44. Omnipedia (0 replies)
  45. Toolserver (3 replies)
  46. Wikis (22 replies)
  47. Are the editors on Simple English Wikipedia in their own little world? (4 replies)
  48. How do you deal with a cabal? (7 replies)
  49. The Book: Progress Report (14 replies)
  50. Export function disabled (11 replies)
  51. Judicial bashing of Wikipedia (6 replies)
  52. "Improve this page" button (3 replies)
  53. Article you would most like to own (9 replies)
  54. Mature admins grooming juvenile users for admin? (5 replies)
  55. Breivik (42 replies)
  56. Wikipedia life expectancy poll (11 replies)
  57. Constructive sockpuppets (9 replies)
  58. Here comes the big bad Terms of Use (42 replies)
  59. Admin gone gaga (20 replies)
  60. Threats to Geo Swan (7 replies)
  61. The Rise and Fall of Online Empires (1 replies)
  62. Copyright infringement on the WR logo (20 replies)
  63. meta Research:Newcomer quality and strategy.wikimedia.org Editor Trends Study (8 replies)
  64. Cyborgology ► Pinterest and Feminism (40 replies)
  65. (22 replies)
  66. (0 replies)
  67. banned means banned (111 replies)
  68. (7 replies)
  69. Wikipedia opening a Teahouse? (10 replies)
  70. ??? (0 replies)
  71. Wikipedia, porn, religion and politics! (43 replies)
  72. Re-purposing Dalmatia (62 replies)
  73. (26 replies)
  74. (4 replies)
  75. WP:BEANS, surely? (7 replies)
  76. Image hiding feature on hold ... (83 replies)
  77. (1 replies)
  78. PR industry to "cooperate" with Wikipedia (73 replies)
  79. Quora (46 replies)
  80. ....doesn't cite sources... (24 replies)
  81. (20 replies)
  82. "The Encyclopedia Game" (12 replies)
  83. (18 replies)
  84. Abuse of power in online groups of strangers, and how to prevent it? (5 replies)
  85. Wikipedia's confused description of LRA (3 replies)
  86. Homophobia - it's not for everyone. (3 replies)
  87. Wikia: Making Money Yet? (52 replies)
  88. Calling all "Vandals" (48 replies)
  89. Cash for spam (42 replies)
  90. Would arbcom ban someone for a user name? (3 replies)
  91. Deleted article (2 replies)
  92. Glucojasinogen (21 replies)
  93. Mike the "Lifeguard" (10 replies)
  94. Crowdsourcing recommended by US law? (2 replies)
  95. WikiAlpha (21 replies)
  96. Call for nominations: chapter-appointed seats on the WMF Board of Trustees (22 replies)
  97. Watchlist spam: get professors to use WP! (2 replies)
  98. Wikimania 2012 (23 replies)
  99. IRC examples (30 replies)
  100. Wikipedia impact on real life (6 replies)
  101. meta is hacked! (8 replies)
  102. Anonymity (92 replies)
  103. Moved: For you, Risker (-- replies)
  104. MuZemike block (8 replies)
  105. CU clarification (5 replies)
  106. Illogicopedia vs Conservapedia deathmatch! (70 replies)
  107. Michigan State offers course on WP adminship (36 replies)
  108. Wikimedia Foundation (2 replies)
  109. Wikimedia Estonia is suing over charity status (8 replies)
  110. The continued march of wiki porn (91 replies)
  111. Wikipedia is a 5th grade classroom (2 replies)
  112. Content contributors (134 replies)
  113. Anonymous (20 replies)
  114. On the Wikipedian mindset (2 replies)
  115. WIKIPEDIA for World Heritage? (8 replies)
  116. Why WMF fundraising could cause future problems (3 replies)
  117. Copyfraud on Commons (6 replies)
  118. The animated gif file of a man mastrubating is in a public domain (14 replies)
  119. Wikipedia - the 'net's biggest POV pusher? (12 replies)
  120. Adhering to copyright policies on Commons (1 replies)
  121. Hyperliterality (17 replies)
  122. Friendly space policy (22 replies)
  123. The Singularity is Not Near: Slowing Growth of Wikipedia (6 replies)
  124. Ashley Van Haefton's double standard? (28 replies)
  125. "Wikipedia Anomalies" (1 replies)
  126. Is using wikipedia hurting kids? (11 replies)
  127. Moved: Down but not out... (-- replies)
  128. Admins go shoot on sight (9 replies)
  129. In which Tom Morris reveals a secret to Mr Fezziwig (9 replies)
  130. Speedy deletion nomination of Main Page (7 replies)
  131. Redirects - encyc.org/wr and encyc.org/wikipediareview (2 replies)
  132. Bad Jokes and other (unfortunately not) deleted nonsese (0 replies)
  133. A New Motto For Wikiland (492 replies)
  134. Undue weight (8 replies)
  135. Leveson Inquiry (1 replies)
  136. "Why Wikipedia is charitable" article (16 replies)
  137. Wikimedia UK's hiring plans (8 replies)
  138. WMF hires an actual accomplished executive (8 replies)
  139. Is somebody paying for inappropriate behavior at Wikipedia? (12 replies)
  140. Ashley Van Haeften caught copying a map and lying about it (25 replies)
  141. Activism at Wikipedia (12 replies)
  142. Section 230: what does it really mean? (17 replies)
  143. Mike Godwin Joins the Review (169 replies)
  144. Dan Murphy, say hello (23 replies)
  145. Wikipedia raises 20 million dollars (6 replies)
  146. Cost of advertising (9 replies)
  147. Effectiveness of checkuser (49 replies)
  148. The "holy shit" slide on editor retention (59 replies)
  149. Messing with photo rights (35 replies)
  150. Prison escapee seeks recognition via Wikipedia (1 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.