Wikipedia Review > JzG's prudish streak

the fieryangel

Tue 13th November 2007, 3:05pm

He's nominated "Cock and Ball Torture" for deletion giving the reason :

QUOTE

This article is nothing more than a restatement of the title. Do we need a separate article on each separate area of the body subject to BDSM activity? Nothing here establishes how this differs from any other kind of BDSM torture.

Well, to give him credit, he did vote delete in the AfD of "list of big bust models" too...but he seems awfully bothered about this. I mean, WP IS an encyclopedia and its uncensored, by definition.

Unfortunately for him, it looks like it's going to be a speedy keep...The least they could do is to add a photo...but I guess you couldn't have a woman do this one, could you?

Moulton

Tue 13th November 2007, 3:09pm

Do they also have separate articles on Water Boarding and Bauder Warding?

the fieryangel

Tue 13th November 2007, 3:14pm

QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 13th November 2007, 4:09pm)

Do they also have separate articles on Water Boarding and Bauder Warding?

I'm dying. That's really funny. I think that Jonny should start another Sock Puppet account and write the Bauder Warding article....

the fieryangel

Tue 13th November 2007, 10:24pm

QUOTE(Taxwoman @ Tue 13th November 2007, 11:13pm)

It's not one of my articles; I'm not really into torture. Well, not nasty torture. Still, it's a good example of a fundamental flaw of Wikipedia. Anyone can intervene in any article, without having a clue about its subject. Of course "we need a separate article on each separate area of the body subject to BDSM activity". Each part of the body is different, and butt plugs cannot be the same as elbow bondage. (I know - he doesn't know his butt from his elbow, does he?) Next he'll say that we don't need separate articles on each London borough. Obviously, all boroughs are similar, aren't they?

I think that he's just fishing for an excuse to get rid of this. If this was a bondage article about binding women with big busts and there could be a photo op for him, then I'm sure that he'd be all for it.

However, you've got a point: if WP is not censored and there is a need for this kind of article, there should be an article about this specific kind of bondage.

Somey

Wed 14th November 2007, 5:13am

I'm not so sure JzG doesn't have the right idea here. I mean, why would they even need these articles about specific torture methods? Aren't all the other 1.999 million articles on WP enough to get the idea across?

Jonny Cache

Wed 14th November 2007, 5:18am

¬2b picky, but isn't «male gentalia» a tautology?

Jonny

the fieryangel

Wed 14th November 2007, 5:58am

QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Wed 14th November 2007, 6:18am)

¬2b picky, but isn't «male gentalia» a tautology?

Jonny

Oh, I didn't notice that. Freudian slip, I guess!

Anyway, I think that JzG is just feeling creepy about the idea of somebody doing this stuff to him....but it's for the PROJECT, JzG!

JohnA

Wed 14th November 2007, 8:26am

Can't we just collect all of these articles under one article on sexual torture?

Disillusioned Lackey

Wed 14th November 2007, 12:09pm

QUOTE(Taxwoman @ Tue 13th November 2007, 4:13pm)

It's not one of my articles; I'm not really into torture. Well, not nasty torture. Still, it's a good example of a fundamental flaw of Wikipedia. Anyone can intervene in any article, without having a clue about its subject. Of course "we need a separate article on each separate area of the body subject to BDSM activity". Each part of the body is different, and butt plugs cannot be the same as elbow bondage. (I know - he doesn't know his butt from his elbow, does he?) Next he'll say that we don't need separate articles on each London borough. Obviously, all boroughs are similar, aren't they?

Well, they are all in England, and those boroughs are parts of London, in quite a similar way.

As we all know, this is a qualification for similitude, per Wikipedia.

Jonny Cache

Wed 14th November 2007, 1:02pm

Except for Swillwell, AB, which us highly dissembler from every other hamlet in Canada.

Jonny

Jonny Cache

Wed 14th November 2007, 1:30pm

QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Tue 13th November 2007, 11:05am)

He's nominated "Cock and Ball Torture" for deletion giving the reason :

QUOTE

This article is nothing more than a restatement of the title. Do we need a separate article on each separate area of the body subject to BDSM activity? Nothing here establishes how this differs from any other kind of BDSM torture.

Knowing JustZisGuyY'Know — a contumation devoutly to be wished away — he probably just misread it as "Cock And Bull Torture", a storied market on which he WP:OWNS the corner, if not indeed the very title that he was reserving for his own prospective WP:BIOMESS.

Jonny