Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: SV tries to explain her lies
Wikipedia Review > Wikimedia Discussion > Editors > Notable editors > SlimVirgin
KamrynMatika
Fri 7th December 2007, 4:40pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cla...in_The_Register

QUOTE
You may want to review WP:NPA. Why do you assume that "one post" versus "eight times" constitutes a lie, rather than an error. I was not and am not a member of the investigations list, but I can easily imagine it being quite easy to misremember the exact participation on a list. I am happy to let SlimVirgin answer for herself, but on the other hand, I can hardly blame her if she just wants to ignore you... the assumption of bad faith and unwillingness to engage her in a sincere dialog in an attempt to understand strikes me as something you might want to drop. Remember, assumption of bad faith is exactly what got Durova going down the wrong path. Don't follow.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


QUOTE
Why do you assume that "one post" versus "eight times" constitutes a lie

QUOTE
Why do you assume that "one post" versus "eight times" constitutes a lie

QUOTE
Why do you assume that "one post" versus "eight times" constitutes a lie


This is beyond ridiculous.

QUOTE
You say you were only subscribed for 16 days, and honestly cannot see how amending - after challenged - "only a single post" to "an average of a post every second day for the duration" might seem even a little disingenuous? Achromatic (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


omg is that common sense i hear? quick, quash it!
the fieryangel
Fri 7th December 2007, 4:50pm
QUOTE(KamrynMatika @ Fri 7th December 2007, 5:40pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cla...in_The_Register
Remember, assumption of bad faith is exactly what got Durova going down the wrong path. Don't follow.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)



So Durova gets be the posterchild to be pointed to when Jimbo needs an example of what happens when you assume bad faith?

Okay, so she deserves it....but it's not very elegant or....gentleman-like for Jimbo to be making statements like this. He'll use anyone, won't he?
Disillusioned Lackey
Fri 7th December 2007, 5:35pm
QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Fri 7th December 2007, 10:50am) *

So Durova gets be the posterchild to be pointed to when Jimbo needs an example of what happens when you assume bad faith?

Well, in all fairness, she IS the poster child to be pointed to for bad faith...

QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Fri 7th December 2007, 10:50am) *

when Jimbo needs an example of what happens when you assume bad faith?

Thoughts: He's been reading our comments about "bad PR" Message Jimbo, man...
YOU'RE WELCOME


QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Fri 7th December 2007, 10:50am) *

Okay, so she deserves it.... for Jimbo to be making statements like this. He'll use anyone, won't he?
He'll use anyone? Cripes! Understatement of the year! This is a man who made his first fortune scraping the porn of strangers off the internet and reselling it as his own.

Is that even a question? Please.

QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Fri 7th December 2007, 10:50am) *

it's not very elegant or....gentleman-like for Jimbo


(Berrrk!) /*Spits up coffee*/

The words "elegant", and "gentleman" don't belong in the same sentence with "Jimbo" .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cla...in_The_Register
Disillusioned Lackey
Fri 7th December 2007, 6:47pm

QUOTE
What Jimbo says: I can easily imagine it being quite easy to misremember the exact participation on a list.


What Jimbo thinks:I can absolutely empathize with this problem. I myself seemed to forget that I, Jimbo Wales was sitting in India's largest technology park during the Essjay affair, and misrecalled that I, Jimbo Wales was in the jungle, away from the internet, and didn't understand how freaked out the world was at what a sociopath I, Jimbo Wales was serious it was.

QUOTE

What Jimbo says: I can hardly blame her if she just wants to ignore you...

What Jimbo thinks: I'd give anything for the same luxury.
QUOTE
What Jimbo saysthe assumption of bad faith and unwillingness to engage her in a sincere dialogue in an attempt to understand strikes me as something you might want to drop.

What Jimbo thinks:Yes, we only accept insincere dialogue. Piss off kiddie.
Daniel Brandt
Fri 7th December 2007, 7:05pm
FORUM Image
Linda Mack dispatched Jimmy Wales
to MI6 headquarters in London.
He spoke on the topic, "Why
Wikipedia is perfect for schoolchildren."

Miltopia
Fri 7th December 2007, 7:34pm
QUOTE(Disillusioned Lackey @ Fri 7th December 2007, 5:35pm) *


QUOTE(KamrynMatika @ Fri 7th December 2007, 5:40pm) *

when Jimbo needs an example of what happens when you assume bad faith?

Thoughts: He's been reading our comments about "bad PR" Message Jimbo, man...
YOUR WELCOME


*You're



Jimbo must be a real jerk to ask a question on Cla68's talk page and then threaten and bully him (and allow others to do the same) when he answers honestly.
Disillusioned Lackey
Fri 7th December 2007, 7:48pm
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Fri 7th December 2007, 1:05pm) *

FORUM Image
Linda Mack dispatched Jimmy Wales
to MI6



Daniel: Did you not see the "007" on the wall?

CLUE!
Disillusioned Lackey
Fri 7th December 2007, 7:59pm
QUOTE(Miltopia @ Fri 7th December 2007, 1:34pm) *

Jimbo must be a real jerk to ask a question on Cla68's talk page and then threaten and bully him (and allow others to do the same) when he answers honestly.

CLUE!
Joseph100
Sat 8th December 2007, 3:00am
QUOTE(Disillusioned Lackey @ Fri 7th December 2007, 1:59pm) *

QUOTE(Miltopia @ Fri 7th December 2007, 1:34pm) *

Jimbo must be a real jerk to ask a question on Cla68's talk page and then threaten and bully him (and allow others to do the same) when he answers honestly.

CLUE!



Jimmy Wales is sounding, more and more like a Jim Jones....

Ding, ding, ding.... people people people.... its Coolaid time
Drink up!! there is plenty to go around.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.