Fri 11th January 2008, 10:39pm
QUOTE(Somey @ Fri 11th January 2008, 1:13pm)
I don't mean to seem contrarian, but... what would be the point of that?
That "harassment links" page has been there for months. Mr. Chapman is completely committed to that policy, in some form or other - and irrationally so, at this point. We're not going to change his mind. Arguing with True Believers is usually a waste of time under even the best of circumstances, and besides, the BADSITES controversy has increased our traffic numbers, not the other way around. It was a huge tactical blunder on their part - they should have known that the rest of the world would see it as censorship. The fact that they didn't suggests a level of delusional thinking that, quite frankly, only reinforces the idea that arguing with him/them would be a waste of time.
Anyway, I fixed the spelling in the thread title...
Well, "WE" all know Mr. Chapman won't and Wiki won't change this policy.
The reason, by they're silence, that they consent to those offensive policies of censorship and the like.
They're refusal will speak of the kind of people and wikipeida is.