...Well, look at what categories this page is in...



Now, is there some sort of logic for this which escapes me, or have they all finally lost their marbles??

No, just one editor:

He evidently doesn't know how to embed the name of a category in the text.

There should be a Categorical Imperative about that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=193501844

"fmt category links as per suggestion found on an attack site..."

GWH is intellectually disappointing.

As are at least two other notable GW's from america, lol.

He blocked Krimpet for making a snarky comment at Dmcdevit.
Now that's funny.

Unblocked after 15 minutes of course. The unblock summary is slightly cryptic.

Well, I can't sympathize with "Krimpet" all that much, given the history…however, she's on the right side of this affair, and that was a horrible block. Worse then the block, even, is the block summary. Was she truly "attempting to harass" Dmcdevit? This is even more ridiculous than Matt57's supposed "harassment" of Elonka by vetting sources in the Dunin family articles. If that's from a pull-down menu, someone should really toss that menu: to bear false witness, which Georgewilliamherbert has just done, is immoral and unethical. Administrators should be forced to type out their reasons and make certain they can stand behind what they write.

And someone should figure out an easy way to purge or alter block logs - imagine if "Krimpet" were using her real name, and she had that false charge associated with it forever.

Perhaps MZMcBride is subtly stating his position that sockpuppets do not have navels. See

http://www.freedomsring.org/belly.html

for a summary of centuries of christian "discussion" on a similar matter.

If so, perhaps we should all thank God that Wikipedia has settled their version of the question with a minimum of bloodshed.

But have they yet ironed out their equivalent of the Arian Heresy? That is, the relationship between Wales and that other guy who may can no longer be named in polite Wikicompany, who may or may not have created Wikipedia in whole or in part?

(Interestingly, the article on the nasty Christian infighting Arius' notions beget are watered down from the get-go at Wikipedia: "Arian Heresy" is a redirect to the more mild, and christian-friendly "Arian Controversy". Those uppity muslim's should take note.)