Sun 23rd March 2008, 5:03pm
Apologies if already posted.
 yes it was already posted but I put thisNow that we're not sleeping together and since you so publicly broke up with my here on this website, the page about me has turned into a complete free-for-all.
in bold as it seemed especially poetic.
 alsoWikipedia is nothing more than the biggest and most prolific defamation machine that the world has ever known, run by people with varying degrees of personality disorders.
Oh, I know all about WP:SOAP, dear. You're talking to the woman whose ex-boyfriend (Jimbo) used this very "encyclopedia" as his own personal soapbox to announce his break-up with her.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelMarsden (talk • contribs) 16:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Caribbean_H.Q."
I have removed that post from your talkpage as it is the same ovrersighted message that was posted on [[User talk:Jwales]] which was oversighted. [[User:AndreNatas|AndreNatas]] ([[User talk:AndreNatas|talk]]) 16:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
+ ::Excellent! Keep up the whitewashing. Please. Great work. It's only giving folks paying attention here in the real world more ammo against Wikipedia. :-)
Please do not edit war as on User talk:Jimbo Wales; please try talking to the editor you are in dispute with. GDonato (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh yeah, cause that TOTALLY works.
If you try to resolve disputes in a calm manner, others will generally be more willing to listen. I understand your concerns but sarcasm is less helpful and likely to see you blocked from editing if you are not careful. I understand your concerns and am not convinced on-wiki is the best way to solve this. Best wishes, GDonato (talk) 16:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Some of us have lives, dear. We live/work in the real world and don't have time for this nonse.se Thanks, but I'd rather deal with this in the "real" world. I agree that it's not going to be solved here. But the behaviour of people on this site in reaction to my post proved exactly the point that I was making. And that's all I was looking for, frankly. Cheers.
Please also review the three revert rule. Basically, if you make more than three reverts to/from the same content in a 24hr period, you can be blocked. Wikipedia's also not the place to vent about Jimbo/your treatment (yes I know Jimbo "dumped you" on WP - that was out of order in my opinion and I expect he's been spoken to about it). Perhaps the most appropriate thing I can say is "don't descend to his level". Thanks, Martinp23 15:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
RachelMarsden, you are posting your edits on the wrong site. We are playing the game "Write an encyclopedia" here. The game you wish to play is being played at a site called Wikipedia Review. WAS 4.250 (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for confirming that this is nothing more than a game. Indeed, the reaction here to my post perfectly illustrated the very point that I was making with it. That's all I wanted to confirm. Have fun playing "encyclopedia".
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RachelMarsden"
:If you're not here to help the encyclopedia, go away. We regularly ban annoyances like you without a second thought. [[User talk:John Reaves|John Reaves]] 16:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
+ :::This is the first time in the history of mankind that "encyclopedia" has been synonymous with "cult". I find that highly amusing.
BTW, feel free and ban me, dear, for making an honest, constructive critique of this whole operation -- and merly restating the fact that I want to be completely disassociated with this cult and have my "article" on here permanently deleted. Banning me will only serve to prove my point, and give me something else to pass on to the "real world" media in all this. I'm sure you know by now that they're kind of paying a bit of attention.
::Please, John, could you be at least a bit more civil here? --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 16:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC) ::Please, John, could you be at least a bit more civil here? --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 16:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Looks like a clear cut case of trolling to me. If she continues, block here. We're here to build an encyclopedia, not get back at our exes. John Reaves 16:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Maybe, but in the interests of writing an encyclopaedia, I think it's best to just leave well alone. Do we really want to take on a woman scorned? It won't be pretty. --Tango (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
*More like WP:PROTECTJIMBOSFEELINGS. ;-) [[User_talk:Daveh4h|daveh4h]] 17:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Iv'e been evicted from the Spanish Wikipedia. How can we ruin this site?
[[User:Damifb|Damifb]] ([[User talk:Damifb|talk]]) 16:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
+ :You won't have to, dear.
Much love, Rachel