Tue 25th April 2006, 8:27pm
QUOTE(Selina @ Wed 8th March 2006, 7:35pm)
sockpuppetry"? That's not a good enough reason to block. If you can't prove this guy is "enviroknot" you shouldn't ban them - One thing I've noticed is that the Muslim Guild of Wikipedia (very similar to the Catholic Alliance of Wikipedia
) tends to classify anyone that disagrees with their
POV-pushing as "an enviroknot sockpuppet" - I had slimvirgin, brandonyusuftorpov, yuber and Anonymous Editor on my back for a while because they claimed I
was one too - Just because I helped another editor in reverting some very blatant POV-pushing by that little clique of vehemently Pro-Islam editors
Yep. So if you are Enviroknot, and Queeran is Enviroknot, then therefore Queeran is also Selina.
I am not too keen on all of this religious talk though, as I believe that all religions should aim to get along, and that it doesn't matter what religion you are, or even if you are an extremist. We have different viewpoints, but every single person on the planet does really. Whether we ally ourselves with one organised religion or another, or don't ally ourselves with any, the reality is that we are all unique individuals. This is why I am against the concept of an organised religion. I believe that religion is a very personal experience, and should be experienced on an individual level without restrictions. We shouldn't be told what to believe, or what not to believe. And one sad thing is that because we ally ourselves with one religion, therefore some people assume extra beliefs that we might have. But we are still individuals. There are gay christians, even though christianity opposes homosexuality. There are even christian wiccans, even though christianity regards witchcraft as evil. This is all because we are all individuals.
The only time when I get upset about someone being in a religion is when that religion is, by its very nature, aiming to hurt others or else has no aim to be nice. I vehemently oppose anyone who regards themselves as a satanist or a demonologist or a black witch or anything along those lines. I oppose anyone who regards themselves as immoral or amoral. I think that we should at least be trying to do the right thing. Even if we get it wrong a lot, as long as we are trying.
I'd still like to see more evidence on this case though.