Sat 19th April 2008, 10:45pm
QUOTE(Kato @ Sat 19th April 2008, 8:14pm)
"JzG does not need a consensus to block, only a belief that a block is appropriate." http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=206590556
Another admin explains and supports JzG's peculiar privileges on Wikipedia.
How about a reasonable
belief that a block is a appropriate? Appealing to Guy's beliefs would only make sense if his judgment were halfway sound, when it's so plainly not.
QUOTE(One @ Sat 19th April 2008, 8:42pm)
JzG, it seems, is more equal than others.
That might also make sense, if this were based on merit. The trouble isn't that some administrators are more equal then others, but that these more-equal administrators aren't selected by merit or for good judgment, don't enjoy the confidence of the community, and don't behave ethically or responsibly.
And there appears to be no way to remedy this situation.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...or_comment/JzG2