Rather than confuse the other threads, here are the points I have regarding FT2's visit yesterday (1 Sep 2008). He has not answered any of them.
1. He claimed to have edited the Zoophilia article only sporadically, yet a cursory glance at the edit trail showed he edited almost continuously since joining in July 2004 (his first two edits were to that article).
2. He claimed on the first thread here opened here, that I am ("not always able to handle being in error, and sometimes makes and endorses blatantly bad content and blatantly obviously untruthful statements"). I asked him to justify this, but he did not reply. I also mentioned about the misattributed Lakoff quote still being there, but he did not respond.
3. I asked him about the TBP sock issue, and why he claims to have written an article that was written by TBP.
 As a background to (2), this
written by FT2, containing evidence for academic endorsement of Neurolinguistic programming and this
is one of the pages referred to. The latter contains a quote attributed to George Lakoff, an eminent linguist, apparently endorsing NLP. It is not by Lakoff. The last time I complained about this on FT2's talk page, I was threatened with a block for 'harassment'.
It is this poor sourcing from Google and evident support of pseudoscience (and other 'fringe' subjects that is my #1 reason for mistrusting FT2. Everything else comes a poor second. Encyclopedic content comes first, always. Such a person (in my humble view) should not be occupying an important position in the world's favourite encyclopedia.
(I have similar issues about the poor sourcing and blatant OR on the Zoophilia article, but let that pass).