Tue 9th September 2008, 7:06pm
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 9th September 2008, 9:38am)
Most amazingly, she addressed us directly:
I also ask that the people who post on Wikipedia Review start asking for solid diffs when someone is being regularly attacked there, then read them and the context carefully. Ditto with Cla68's evidence on the ArbCom page.
This is remarkable in its arrogance. The SlimVirgin file here is absolutely chock-full
of detailed, linked evidence of her mis-deeds, as is Cla68's evidence. This statement is a triumphant use of the Bush-era "Big Lie" tactic to whitewash all of that evidence into insignificance, and it is outrageous.
To say the least. Cla68's number of diffs detailing SV's nastiness is so detailed that MEGO, as in tl;dr. Which apparently most of the people who saw it did not. I did read a lot of those diffs, and Slim really is nasty. She may be able to write, but she is the sort of person who should NEVER be given any sort of power in any project.
If you're going to take over WP, you have to have a bunch of cultivated socks who appear to be youngish females (thus suseptible to victimization if the need arrises), and who will attract the protective instincts of the admins in the sisterhood.
Then keep your head down and edit, edit, for awhile. If you can't write, do reversions like the Naked Nubile Norwegian. Make lists, make biographies. Especially biographies of Jews, ala RachelBrown and Arniep/Jorge and Mantanmoreland and so on. That will win you friends. Express pro-zionist opinions a lot, like Chip Berlet. Ditto.
[I actually wondered at some point if our Jorge wasn't a Gary Weiss sock, come to tweak us on WR with a real Mantan pic. But their edit histories aren't greatly concordant given their mutual interest in film and bio. So nevermind]
Note: you may be a compusive listmaker, and that will help you on WP, which is basically a bunch of lists. But stay away specifically from lists of Jews,
or else you will trigger the paranoic immune response of the Kabal, who will figure you're making up lists for future termination in the coming death camps. That's what got the PoetBeast crossed with the Slimbeast, else both of them might have ended up as good friends, eventually, having really both about the same range of interests. But if you cross Slim or Jayjg you will be checkusered relentlessly, and that was the beginning of the end for Poetbeast, good backstories or not.
And then Poetbeast, partly banniated from WP, had to come over to WR. Where the thing appears to have been Guy, Poetlister, Yehudi, Taxwoman, and LamontStormstar. Did I forget anybody? All the same MB guy, 51 year-old statistician and transvestite wannabe, originally from Ilford.
Now, in the distressing and heart-rending Taxwoman PMs to JohnA, there recurs this backstory, which is good enough for a Dickens novel if not true, which we've been hearing in the RachelBrown defences on WR and WP now for 3 years and more. Guy is this mellow older guy who has known Rachel Brown's father for 15 years and goes to the same church, which is doubtless a Methodist one, and this person is Londoneye's uncle, which would make Londoneye and Rachel Brown first cousins (right?). And Taxwoman personally knows Poetlister, who is female and recently wed, and has been driven to drink by this whole thing. (Cato on WQ too, one would imagine
Baxter is not particularly a Jewish name (the PoetBeast has edited on the Baxter
article under 3 socknames), and I wonder how much of the Methodism in the backstory comes from something in the MB reallife, however much he's obscessed with making lists and biograhies of Jews.
Thoughts, anybody? My mind continues to boggle at how vociferously our own "Verbal" Kint
denies knowing anything about Keyser Söze, even though we've rounded up the usual suspects and nailed them three ways from Sunday.
In a previous message I noted that robbery and homicide detectives, who interview crooks for a living, call these pathological liars "shitters". And even though cops are permitted to lie to suspects in interviews, and do, their motto is "You can outshoot a shooter, but you can't outshit a shitter." And I can see the point.