Where's that list from?
I've got friends in weird places, just not enough of them. These are votes sorted by timestamp of voter's last edit, where same is earlier than midnight Oct. 31. Those appearing to have no timestamp are names for which no user currently exists, due to name-changes during the election.
There are several names on that list that are not on John's list and some names on John's list that are not on that list.
Okay, so let's post it and figure out which list is more accurate. Pool them together even.
I guess the concern is that someone who has not edited in X months and then voted, might also have a sockpuppet who voted.
That concern will still exist regardless of recent editing habits.
That's not even worth the effort to investigate unless 25 votes (more or less) would change the outcome.
B-b-but… I thought even the scrutineers would not know who you voted for. Even assuming the most pathological case where each of us listed above voted for all the under-dogs and against all the favorites, I thought the results (or provisional results, point-spreads, etc.) were to remain boxed until eligibility disputes are resolved/final (unless there was some other principled reason not to give voters an up-to-the minute status chart during the voting period).
Either this is a catch-22 or someone (here probably) has misled me regarding these points.