http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Skeptic%27s_Annotated_Bible

Not his first attempt at fundamentalist Christian censorship/POV pushing either. I mentioned him in another topic. His 1st edit was an AFD for Secular Student Alliance, and immediately after starting the AFD, he removed a sourced mention of the organization from the Ken Ham article using a deceptive edit summary. He's also tried to insert anti-vaccination POV into articles related to STDs using fringe sources and misleading text (I'm guessing to push an abstinence-only POV).

Now he's trying to have an article on Skeptic's Annotated Bible (a Bible with critical annotations) deleted. His reason for discrediting one of the sources in the article was that the site is unreliable because "it called Jack Chick's website 'Hardcore Christian porn'". No really.

You should try using their tactics, and start spreading the word that Seregain (T-C-L-K-R-D) and his pals want to "delete the Bible."

Also, I checked, and apparently the words "delete," "erase," and "expunge" are never used in either the old or new testaments. So it's perfectly clear that Mr. Seregain is acting in opposition to his own beliefs here.

Or is he?

"Porn is rampant at the National Sciences Foundation"

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=331517584

Scientists get horny, too. Maybe especially scientists.

That user page still irks you? Crimey.

He added a link to a subpage which contained a big personal rant against me and my edits. I removed it myself but another user told me just to nominate the page for deletion instead. Looks like an admin nuked the subpage (I didn't even mind him keeping the subpage since he'd used it in our AN/I dispute, I just had an issue with him linking the attack page from his profile).

Hey, look! It finally got deleted in September! Ha!