Fri 5th November 2010, 7:17pm
QUOTE(Shalom @ Fri 5th November 2010, 11:02am)
I got massive LOL of celebrating the epic destruction of Wikipedia's corrupt power structure evident at Redthunder's RFA:
Current version: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...ship/Redthoreau
And most comical of all: some of the trolls who expressed their dislike of Redthoreau's past activities are just as guilty as he is,
of "incivility" and "abuse" and "editwarring". Sarek, SandyGeorgia, take a bow! And YellowMonkey........
Oppose This guy is a communist POV pusher YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 01:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Ok, so who had 4 hours and 5 minutes on the McCarthyite office poll? Oh, guess what, my favorite baseball team is also the Cincinnati Reds! Ahh! If you can't show where I have claimed to be a "Communist" anywhere, then I would ask that you redact your accusation. Redthoreau -- (talk) 01:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
And verging on a Castro/Guevara SPA (waiting for edit stats to be added to talk). Please clean up that talk page! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Certainly not in the last year or two, although I addressed the SPA status in the first year up above. As for my talk page, I can't believe that is even relevant to a nomination process. Can some here at least give the impression that this process isn't one big fucking joke? Redthoreau -- (talk) 01:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
It's very obvious from your writing record that if some communist breaks 3RR, the page will get protected, but if a "reactionary" does so, a block, and likely a lengthy one will land on their head. Anyone can check your Castro/Guevara/Batista edits and tell YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 01:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
YM, are you aware that editors have been banned for engaging in accusations similar to your's? DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
It's not just me. RFA hazing was bad for me and has gotten only worse since 2008.Just watch. This is only the beginning.
I would not be at all surprised to see antics like those at 419eater
, being applied to prospective WP admins.
Wikipedia started with a lot of mushmouthing about "egalitarianism".
As time wore on, it became more and more exclusionary.
Unless the leadership is completely routed out, it will become an arrogant private club --
especially to those seeking admin powers. "Thanks for the free labor, unpaid volunteer editors!
Oh, you want some political power? Piss off."