Favorite quote from this thing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal..._of_permissions
On a side note, does anyone know if "I'm an admin" pickup lines work?
A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
The opposite would also be a red flag situation. If an account remains active for much longer than a century, you can be sure that the original editor is deceased and the account has been handed over to someone else. Count Iblis (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
We do have some ninety years to come up with a procedure for such cases. — Coren (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Sure ... though the idea of hereditary adminship is rather appealing
Roger Davies talk 06:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
... and some editors already think we're Lords in a fiefdom ... :-P (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, if that were the case, we'd need to determine whether administrative rights are transferred by cognatic or agnatic primogeniture. ;-) Kirill [talk] [prof] 15:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Why are you excluding matrilineal primogeniture? — Coren (talk) 20:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
And Salic law. Let's not forget Salic law. Roger Davies talk 20:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The day we have the "Viscount of Vandal-Whacking", I'm running fast and far
SirFozzie (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
User:SonOfPedro has already been promised his birth-right. Pedro : Chat 21:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
B) I would not be surprised if a few of them really DO want Wikipedia adminship to be inheritable.
Now, THAT would be funny.