lilburne
Sat 25th February 2012, 11:11pm
QUOTE(Fusion @ Sat 25th February 2012, 10:24pm)

Hmm. I picked a recent picture at random which turned out to be not pornographic
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pep...012_%281%29.jpgbut it was taken lat month from Flickr allegedly under a CC licence confirmed by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiropractic/6756056431/It is now "All rights reserved". How reliable is this bot, and if it is right why was the licence changed?
The photogs default upload is CC-BY-SA but the photos from two events were re-set to ARR. This was done after they uploaded maybe because they had a chance of selling some of the content, or they were doing it as a paid contract and forgot to reset the license, or maybe they worked out that the content was being scrapped. Which ever way it was the bot is probably correct that they were at one point CC-BY-SA.