Tue 3rd April 2012, 6:44pm
QUOTE(andrewedwardjudd2 @ Tue 3rd April 2012, 1:34pm)
I dont see what the topic of the greenhouse effect has to do with AGW.
It doesn't matter - we're not talking about science anymore, we're talking about politics and gamesmanship. It's fine if you want to restrict yourself to a purely scientific discussion here
of course, but don't expect to get anywhere on Wikipedia doing that.
Terrorists are taking over Science and unless Science fights back then terrorism is going to win.
True, but again you have to understand that on Wikipedia, the terrorists have not only won, they've formed their own government, re-written the law books, and are already negotiating trade deals with China. To them, you're
now the "terrorist." Science is a good weapon to have at your disposal, but they've got highly effective shields against that. Meanwhile, they're painting you with a very
large brush, and if you want to succeed with all this, you're going to need some paint-remover.
Again, I'm not trying to criticize you, I'm just saying that to make progress in this endeavor you might have to change your thinking a bit - and in some cases, that might even mean thinking in ways that are quite nearly opposite to how you might normally.