Greetings to those who know me.
I'd be interested to see anything related to the EEML case - late 2009.
I was the clerk on that case, and the conduct of one particular arb led to my withdrawal from the project.
As clerk I was strict but even-handed on this very contentious case. Numerous people received page bans for getting too heated. Most of those people, (eg Radek), accepted their punishment with class and dignity.
However when I applied the same strict discipline to a "special buddy" of an arb, I was quickly made aware that some editors were more equal than others.
Hence I'd be keen to see what was said behind the scenes.
This post has been edited by Manning Bartlett:
|