QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 7th March 2012, 2:39pm)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Wed 7th March 2012, 2:04pm)
Carbuncle, you are going down the wrong track. In the end, the issue for Wikimedia (wearing a Wiki hat) is not who he is, but what he did on Wikimedia, what his fellow apologists are doing, and what tracks have been covered up. They are using the "what happens off Wiki, stays off Wiki" line but Genil clearly is saying that the line was crossed, and the evidence of this has been deleted, and Beta_M is even saying "Yes, I did these things, where is the problem?"
Ah, but that isn't what Beta M is saying on Commons. It is what I would expect him to say, but he
seems to be saying that he is not the person charged, which I find surprising. Then again, you may be saying that his activities on-wiki are enough to merit a ban, which is a harder case to make.
I note a major revision of his information, and then I presume an admin will hide further information. It makes you wonder who else is being protected in a similar way.
In the end, this came up because he is a self-promoting pornographer, complaining he is being censored, promoting his own porn site, and dishing out awards for people who likewise promote sexual material of dubious nature on Wikmedia.
He is not denying he is the anarchist pornographer, he is denying that he was the person jailed, though the trail from one to another via his own Internet posting seemed pretty complete to me.