QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Wed 7th March 2012, 2:04pm)
Carbuncle, you are going down the wrong track. In the end, the issue for Wikimedia (wearing a Wiki hat) is not who he is, but what he did on Wikimedia, what his fellow apologists are doing, and what tracks have been covered up. They are using the "what happens off Wiki, stays off Wiki" line but Genil clearly is saying that the line was crossed, and the evidence of this has been deleted, and Beta_M is even saying "Yes, I did these things, where is the problem?"
Ah, but that isn't what Beta M is saying on Commons. It is what I would expect him to say, but he
seems to be saying that he is not the person charged, which I find surprising. Then again, you may be saying that his activities on-wiki are enough to merit a ban, which is a harder case to make.
This post has been edited by carbuncle: