This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
I am anarchist prisoner from Russia in Amerikan gulag. Thanx a lot for your paper, even though I disagree with a lot in it, it's important to remain oneself in these hard times without becoming reactionary. In solidarity, fighting for my idea of better world.
VolodyA! V. Mozhenkov Federal Correctional Institution Elkton Lisbon, Ohio
HELENA, Montana (AP) - A Russian man has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for downloading pornographic pictures - some involving children - to a computer at a local college.
Vladimir Mozhenkov was arrested last December after federal agents traced more than 37 pornographic images posted on the Internet to one of Carroll College's computer labs.
Mozhenkov admitted to having child pornography on several diskettes and using computers at the college to distribute child pornography.
At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography. He faces deportation after serving his sentence.
The word 'even' is telling. For he only served 23 months of the sentence and was released in October 2004 http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServl...429-046&x=0&y=0. So he could show where he was even as far back as November 2004. All this information was in the WR thread that was linked to in the discussion. But of course Wikipedians don't want to read WR.
The word 'even' is telling. For he only served 23 months of the sentence and was released in October 2004 http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServl...429-046&x=0&y=0. So he could show where he was even as far back as November 2004. All this information was in the WR thread that was linked to in the discussion. But of course Wikipedians don't want to read WR.
Reading between the lines is that his defence is that promoting consensual under-age sex is not pedophilia therefore the allegations of him being a pedophile are false. He does not deny promoting consensual under-age sex. Wikimedians are too excited to worry about the niceties of the distinction (i.e. there isn't one).