QUOTE
I suppose that answers the question I had. So there's no evidence that they've ever been advocating for pedophilia at all? It's just that there's this old conviction from more than a decade ago that somehow means they must be blocked? SilverserenC 19:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
The evidence was what I posted about, and was then blocked for.
A forum search on Prison Talk
https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&output=sear....prisontalk.com shows he is active in 2003, which is after his release. Quite unrepentant, indeed, his whole 'anarchist' persona is a reinvention of himself, as a victim of the state Gulag.
Moving on to 2006, the most damning evidence is a freenet page here
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&...X-wlKEn-O7BUSywHe has taken that down in the last 24 hours but you can still see the old version in the Google cache
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/sear...n&ct=clnk&gl=uk In any case I took a copy. He mentions in 2006 how he was involved with and approved of the child abuser Damien Roberto Andres Cole, a member of Boychat and host of the now-defunct Pedologues podcast (you can read about Rookiee here
http://evil-unveiled.com/Rookiee).
This is where he (Beta) makes the comment below. When I asked him if that was his page, I was blocked for it, as we know.
QUOTE
Lately i´ve been becoming bold. I´ve started openly promoting childlove movement on open forums, without any reservations that i had before. I don´t feel somehow bad about it, and i do feel that it is a correct thing to do. I think that it is all fine that childlovers set up their own little places and talk to each other, but as was said in one of the podcasts of pedologues (i think it was the third episode) there needs to be a community connection. What happens today is that there is childlove movement, and those who never heard of it… nothing in between at all.