Pff, I see your evidence and raise you my 2005 calling Haiduc out on his crap (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/wink.gif)
wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:LGBT_notice_board/Archive_3#what_belongs_here(from
this hastily put together jumble of quotes/links, that in retrospect could've been made a lot better (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)) (
more Haiduc stuff)
Now:
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mistress_Selina_Kyle QUOTE
You made some very serious accusations against one of my fellow-administrators: Called him/ implied that he is Xenophobic, is a promoter of illegal rape of children.
(The former, I proved with my diff links in the main thread he links to, the latter is not true by the same diff he links, I said PierreSelim was harassing people who brought up that other people were)
QUOTE
My view of regarding to WikpediaReview (or however they call themselves): Sometimes they have valid points but the manner how they try to achieve their goals on Commons is often very disruptive. You can imagine that I have a lot to do so if they would just keep the discussion on-topic and neutral, I would be very pleased.
I am inclined to block beta m (though, the user could simply create socks and we would need a lot more time identifying them as account creation takes time), if you could present me a summary, neutral fact-based-evidence that he is involved in en:Child pornography or one of our policy-block reasons applies. While doing so, imagine, you were an administrator and have to go with the policy. Please understand that we are not the police. If you have evidence of a criminal act, please contact your next police office and the wikimedia foundation. If you fail to do so; what do I expect? Please redact your comments to somewhat more helpful, less offensive, more neutral. In hope of your cooperation, sincerely -- RE rillke questions? 14:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I linked to Peter's excellent post here:
wikipediareview.com/?showtopic=37062&view=findpost&p=302199This post has been edited by Selina: