QUOTE(lilburne @ Wed 14th March 2012, 9:38pm)
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Wed 14th March 2012, 9:29pm)
Yeah well Dcoetzee is known to have a problem with laws he don't like. I note he's also busy with the broom sweeping everything away.
Does this fuckwit not even have a basic understanding of English?
"
The term "convicted pedophile" has been floating around a lot in this conversation. There's no such thing - pedophilia (defined as sexual attraction to children) is not a crime. Sexual abuse of children (including statutory rape) and possession/distribution of child pornography are crimes, and a responsible, ethical pedophile does not do these things. I haven't seen convincing evidence that this user (rather than an identically-named person) was in fact convicted for possession of child pornography. "
A "convicted paedophile" means a paedophile who has been convicted, not someone who is convicted of paedophilia.
And WTF is an "ethical pedophile"? I'll tell what one is, it's a paedophile who just
thinks about diddling kiddies. Either that or one who drives a Prius on the way to the playground.
What a schmuck.
QUOTE
(rather than an identically-named person)
Who is also Russian, went to the same American university at the same time, the same English university at the same time, was in Montana at the same time, returned to Russia at the same time, is an anarchist with an interest in porn.
Nah, probably not the same person, he's right. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/irony.gif)
This post has been edited by Cunningly Linguistic: