This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
I am anarchist prisoner from Russia in Amerikan gulag. Thanx a lot for your paper, even though I disagree with a lot in it, it's important to remain oneself in these hard times without becoming reactionary. In solidarity, fighting for my idea of better world.
VolodyA! V. Mozhenkov Federal Correctional Institution Elkton Lisbon, Ohio
HELENA, Montana (AP) - A Russian man has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for downloading pornographic pictures - some involving children - to a computer at a local college.
Vladimir Mozhenkov was arrested last December after federal agents traced more than 37 pornographic images posted on the Internet to one of Carroll College's computer labs.
Mozhenkov admitted to having child pornography on several diskettes and using computers at the college to distribute child pornography.
At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography. He faces deportation after serving his sentence.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141
What is it with the vociferous defence of Beta M by Saibo, Niabot and Mattbuck all about? In spite of all the evidence, in spite of common sense they continue to defend this kiddy fiddler at all costs?
There must be some deeper meaning, agenda or purpose to this? Surely they must realise that aside from the "think of the kids" angle, the whole point of not letting a known and convicted paedophile edit is to protect the project.
Given that Commons and WMF need a constant supply of donations to carry on doing as it/they does/do, how long do you think it will take for those donations to start to dry up when it is known that a convicted kiddy fiddler is not only known to be active on the project, but is actively being defended by other editors, including administrators. Don't these enablers know that this has the potential to kill Commons? Not only through donations but via lawsuits too.
And they had the gall to indef me because I was uncivil to a known paedophile and his enablers in spite of my contributions there, but they continue to allow the enablers to defend the diddler? It's all fucking crazy.