QUOTE(DanMurphy @ Wed 7th March 2012, 8:41am)
So to review: A major defender of the porn on Wikipedia commons is a convicted child pornographer, who makes videos about the unfair persecution of pedophiles by "the man." The convicted child pornographer has a voice in attempts to change image policy surrounding pornography, its filtering, and the protection of children. The convicted child pornographer is unblocked, and this forum is attacked by other Wikipedia Commons/Administrators as a "horrible site" for... pointing out that he's a convicted child pornographer.
Do I have this right?
How is this news when he was pointed as aiding the pederasts on Commons before? I'm surprised people took til now to realize it when I and others pointed it out in the many disputes there.
It's kinda obvious. See how that pic and many young naked boys pics are there (I'm not linking to the child porn, but he did defend it) and have to be kept no matter what? It means he has an obsessed mind.
Look at his contribs and see who he is defending. The whole pedo/peder cabal is quite creepy and prevalent.
The sad thing is that most of them hide behind "homosexuality" and many here on WR enabled that.
This post has been edited by Ottava: