|
|
|
Wizardman exits Arb-Warts |
|
|
RDH(Ghost In The Machine) |
|
And the admins broke Piggy's glasses...
Group: Regulars
Posts: 613
Joined:
From: Hell, Your Majesty...
Member No.: 15,578
|
Well this has been an exciting week at castle Wikivania. First Jimbozo is forced to clip his founder's wings, and now Wizardman (who owes his seat to him) has stepped down from the ArbCom.QUOTE When I originally ran for the arbitration committee at the end of 2008, I ran under one promising a reversal of arbcom's slowness and inactivity. I like to believe that I accomplished this as an arb in 2009. However, looking back at what I have done as an arb in 2010, I see that I have done very little, instead working in other areas of Wikipedia. Essentially, I've become the very thing I ran against. As a result, I cannot in good conscience remain an arbitrator, and announce my resignation. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 06:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Given how much he craves petty-power and enjoys the game, I'm somewhat skeptical about the above. Ex-ArbCons really don't have much influence and no power, unlike under the Fred Bauder court. There has to be more going on here. Speculation? (Comicals are always welcome!) Anyone with inside info? (Please PM me, if you don't wish to post it here;)
|
|
|
|
EricBarbour |
|
blah
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Fri 14th May 2010, 9:24am) Money on the table that he is going to be outed as a sock of a "banned" user. Would not be surprised. He's already been caught violating COI, and trying to cover up the evidence. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif) (And please don't try to tell me he isn't Dan Tylicki, former Baldwin-Wallace College student. Too much proof. He even wrote the WP article about the college's founder.) QUOTE Ahhh yes... the ArbCom. They were big back in the day. What ever happened to those guys? Don't know, don't care, please don't encourage them to "do something"...... This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
|
|
|
|
MZMcBride |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 671
Joined:
Member No.: 10,962
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 14th May 2010, 5:16pm) QUOTE Ahhh yes... the ArbCom. They were big back in the day. What ever happened to those guys? Don't know, don't care, please don't encourage them to "do something"...... Or what? This site would have something to discuss?
|
|
|
|
gomi |
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined:
Member No.: 565
|
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Fri 14th May 2010, 2:50pm) QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 14th May 2010, 5:16pm) QUOTE Ahhh yes... the ArbCom. They were big back in the day. What ever happened to those guys? Don't know, don't care, please don't encourage them to "do something"...... Or what? This site would have something to discuss? Oh, between Wiki-Porn, Larry Sanger, "malamanteau" words, Jimbo's founder bits, and the like, we've had plenty to discuss lately. Boring old ArbCom would simply be a distraction. Try to keep up, McBride.
|
|
|
|
RDH(Ghost In The Machine) |
|
And the admins broke Piggy's glasses...
Group: Regulars
Posts: 613
Joined:
From: Hell, Your Majesty...
Member No.: 15,578
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Fri 14th May 2010, 4:24pm) No great loss. Money on the table that he is going to be outed as a sock of a "banned" user.
(Warned you I'd nick that pic Cedric (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/wink.gif) Or he knowingly covered for someone else's sock. I place 500 Quatloos on each contingency. QUOTE(gomi @ Fri 14th May 2010, 10:43pm) QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Fri 14th May 2010, 2:50pm) QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 14th May 2010, 5:16pm) QUOTE Ahhh yes... the ArbCom. They were big back in the day. What ever happened to those guys? Don't know, don't care, please don't encourage them to "do something"...... Or what? This site would have something to discuss? Oh, between Wiki-Porn, Larry Sanger, "malamanteau" words, Jimbo's founder bits, and the like, we've had plenty to discuss lately. Boring old ArbCom would simply be a distraction. Try to keep up, McBride. True. But too often in the midst of the big stories the relevant little ones are lost.
|
|
|
|
everyking |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined:
Member No.: 81
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 16th May 2010, 5:05am) QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 15th May 2010, 8:47pm) Interestingly, Hersfold just resigned too. That leaves 11 active arbitrators. Aren't there supposed to be 18? Maybe someday people will listen to the two simple reforms I've been proposing: full annual elections, and filling vacancies by promoting the next ranking candidate from the last election. That would require "reform", silly boy. It won't happen. The whole thing will collapse first. Actually, there was an RfC on the process last year, and surprisingly enough the community's preferences were adopted. So it's really not an issue of inertia, corruption, or anything like that: it's just bad decision-making. There was a vote on the full annual election proposal, and it was resoundingly rejected. People want "institutional memory", I suppose. I say if someone has a memory worth preserving, they should be re-elected every year. Personally I think the ArbCom would be better off forgetting absolutely everything it did before 2009 (except perhaps for the purposes of "truth and reconciliation"...), and even for the period since then some selective amnesia would be beneficial.
|
|
|
|
SirFozzie |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined:
Member No.: 1,200
|
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 16th May 2010, 6:59pm) QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sun 16th May 2010, 10:28pm) No great loss, either. Who do you think is the next to go? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) SirFozzie. If someone gives you good odds on that, let me know. I could make a fortune. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) No, seriously, have no reason to, not burned out, still find things a challenge.. and still learning things (Alastair 2 was my first draft decision), for example
|
|
|
|
Cla68 |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 2:40am) QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 16th May 2010, 6:59pm) QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sun 16th May 2010, 10:28pm) No great loss, either. Who do you think is the next to go? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) SirFozzie. If someone gives you good odds on that, let me know. I could make a fortune. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) No, seriously, have no reason to, not burned out, still find things a challenge.. and still learning things (Alastair 2 was my first draft decision), for example I think you guys may start getting snowed-under without Wizardman, Hersfold, and the others who have left to help share the load. Why not have an out-of-cycle election in a couple of months? You can say that you're doing it because it was suggested on Wikipedia Review.
|
|
|
|
SirFozzie |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined:
Member No.: 1,200
|
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Mon 17th May 2010, 12:38am) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 2:40am) QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 16th May 2010, 6:59pm) QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sun 16th May 2010, 10:28pm) No great loss, either. Who do you think is the next to go? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) SirFozzie. If someone gives you good odds on that, let me know. I could make a fortune. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) No, seriously, have no reason to, not burned out, still find things a challenge.. and still learning things (Alastair 2 was my first draft decision), for example I think you guys may start getting snowed-under without Wizardman, Hersfold, and the others who have left to help share the load. Why not have an out-of-cycle election in a couple of months? You can say that you're doing it because it was suggested on Wikipedia Review. My personal thoughts... The committee has ducked below 11 before, in the past few years.. this is why they bumped the committee up to 18.. to have this bit of a cushion. We'll be back up to 13 shortly (MD is back, and Cool Hand Luke has stated that he will be returning shortly), so I don't really see a need. Also, other reasons: 1) Elections are a pain in the ass to set up and to administer. Trust me, we're learning that right now with the CU/OS elections. 2) We already have a CU/OS election running till the end of May, I think even trying to have a quick election would be time consuming (quick meaning, what, 2 weeks to nominate, 2 weeks for questions, 2 weeks for voting? That'd take us to Mid July, and then 2 more weeks to get everyone identified to the foundation and up to speed with the various mailing lists and the like.. August.. and then there's another election starting three months from then? Also, here's something to consider.. the Committee's workload is, quite frankly, not that big right now. We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests (the first time in a very long time I can remember there isn't at least one request), We have one case already in voting (Transcendental Meditation) and one about to hit voting (Russavia-Biophys).. but.. that's really it. So as things stand right now, we'd be electing someone for a short term where there's not much to do. This post has been edited by SirFozzie:
|
|
|
|
Cla68 |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 6:30am) QUOTE(Cla68 @ Mon 17th May 2010, 12:38am) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 2:40am) QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 16th May 2010, 6:59pm) QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sun 16th May 2010, 10:28pm) No great loss, either. Who do you think is the next to go? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) SirFozzie. If someone gives you good odds on that, let me know. I could make a fortune. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) No, seriously, have no reason to, not burned out, still find things a challenge.. and still learning things (Alastair 2 was my first draft decision), for example I think you guys may start getting snowed-under without Wizardman, Hersfold, and the others who have left to help share the load. Why not have an out-of-cycle election in a couple of months? You can say that you're doing it because it was suggested on Wikipedia Review. My personal thoughts... The committee has ducked below 11 before, in the past few years.. this is why they bumped the committee up to 18.. to have this bit of a cushion. We'll be back up to 13 shortly (MD is back, and Cool Hand Luke has stated that he will be returning shortly), so I don't really see a need. Also, other reasons: 1) Elections are a pain in the ass to set up and to administer. Trust me, we're learning that right now with the CU/OS elections. 2) We already have a CU/OS election running till the end of May, I think even trying to have a quick election would be time consuming (quick meaning, what, 2 weeks to nominate, 2 weeks for questions, 2 weeks for voting? That'd take us to Mid July, and then 2 more weeks to get everyone identified to the foundation and up to speed with the various mailing lists and the like.. August.. and then there's another election starting three months from then? Also, here's something to consider.. the Committee's workload is, quite frankly, not that big right now. We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests (the first time in a very long time I can remember there isn't at least one request), We have one case already in voting (Transcendental Meditation) and one about to hit voting (Russavia-Biophys).. but.. that's really it. So as things stand right now, we'd be electing someone for a short term where there's not much to do. Okay, it just seems that the cases you all have right now are taking awhile to get resolved. The Transcendential Meditation case, for example, is finally starting to get some action on the proposed decision, and it opened 12 weeks ago. This post has been edited by Cla68:
|
|
|
|
Subtle Bee |
|
melli fera, fera...
Group: Inactive
Posts: 340
Joined:
Member No.: 17,787
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 1:48am) [...]as we get closer to summer, people find better things to do then to argue on Wikipedia?
I wonder if it would be possible to get that mentioned in this article? Face it though, for a significant demographic, the only meaning summer has is a glare on the monitor. This post has been edited by Subtle Bee:
|
|
|
|
everyking |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined:
Member No.: 81
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 7:30am) 1) Elections are a pain in the ass to set up and to administer. Trust me, we're learning that right now with the CU/OS elections.
2) We already have a CU/OS election running till the end of May, I think even trying to have a quick election would be time consuming (quick meaning, what, 2 weeks to nominate, 2 weeks for questions, 2 weeks for voting? That'd take us to Mid July, and then 2 more weeks to get everyone identified to the foundation and up to speed with the various mailing lists and the like.. August.. and then there's another election starting three months from then?
Also, here's something to consider.. the Committee's workload is, quite frankly, not that big right now. We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests (the first time in a very long time I can remember there isn't at least one request), We have one case already in voting (Transcendental Meditation) and one about to hit voting (Russavia-Biophys).. but.. that's really it.
So as things stand right now, we'd be electing someone for a short term where there's not much to do.
So go down the list. Or at least explain why you think that would be a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
everyking |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined:
Member No.: 81
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 6:42pm) Ok, I can do that...
Right now, we would need four replacement arbs (we started at 18, we have 12, and two inactives). If we went down the list, we would have two people who fell just short (AGK and RUslik0), with around 56-57% support.. but if we went any further, we'd be getting people who got 51-52%. Do you think the community would really be supportive if there were new members of the committee who BARELY got a majority of support?
I can't imagine why they wouldn't be. In order to be properly representative and reasonably productive (by ArbCom standards, at least), the ArbCom should be A) composed of the people who got the highest number of votes in the last election and B) fully staffed. If some arbitrators decide they don't want to do the job anymore, then the results of the last election need to be reconfigured to reassign the seats that have been vacated.
|
|
|
|
A Horse With No Name |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
|
QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 15th May 2010, 11:47pm) Interestingly, Hersfold just resigned too. That leaves 11 active arbitrators. Aren't there supposed to be 18? Maybe someday people will listen to the two simple reforms I've been proposing: full annual elections, and filling vacancies by promoting the next ranking candidate from the last election. Of course, there is always the option of actually paying for professional editorial management of the site, as opposed to expecting telephone help desk operators, law school students or hospital risk managers to be able to handle tasks for which they have no educational or occupational training. Yes, it involves spending money -- but in the long run, it makes more sense to have three or four trained professionals versus 18 clueless amateurs.
|
|
|
|
Milton Roe |
|
Known alias of J. Random Troll
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined:
Member No.: 5,156
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 17th May 2010, 12:37pm) QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 15th May 2010, 11:47pm) Interestingly, Hersfold just resigned too. That leaves 11 active arbitrators. Aren't there supposed to be 18? Maybe someday people will listen to the two simple reforms I've been proposing: full annual elections, and filling vacancies by promoting the next ranking candidate from the last election. Of course, there is always the option of actually paying for professional editorial management of the site, as opposed to expecting telephone help desk operators, law school students or hospital risk managers to be able to handle tasks for which they have no educational or occupational training. Yes, it involves spending money -- but in the long run, it makes more sense to have three or four trained professionals versus 18 clueless amateurs. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) You're going to buy cows when milk is free? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/happy.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
EricBarbour |
|
blah
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 7:30am) We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests Dealing with AN would be a good way to help improve Arbcom's public reputation. Well, maybe. No guarantees. But doing anything is better than being "on hiatus". If nothing will be done, then please explain to us all why AN gets away with shit like this. QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Mon 17th May 2010, 6:48pm) If the "free" milk is lumpy and smells bad, yes. This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
|
|
|
|
A Horse With No Name |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 18th May 2010, 12:25am) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 7:30am) We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests Dealing with AN would be a good way to help improve Arbcom's public reputation. Well, maybe. No guarantees. But doing anything is better than being "on hiatus". Yes. For starters, Arbcom can explain how they awarded themselves subpoena power when there is no such authority spelled out for them in WP policy. They can also explain why they disabled the account of an editor who, in no way whatsoever, violated the clearly-defined policies of WP:BLOCK. And since it appears that AN is under observation for alleged "socking" via IP edits, perhaps old lady arbitrator Risker would care to identify the "socks" that she allows to participate on WP, as per her astonishing acknowledgment during last September's Law/The_Undertow debacle, with a compare-and-contrast regarding why those "socks" can play on WP but AN cannot? This post has been edited by A Horse With No Name:
|
|
|
|
SirFozzie |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined:
Member No.: 1,200
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 18th May 2010, 12:25am) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 7:30am) We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests Dealing with AN would be a good way to help improve Arbcom's public reputation. Well, maybe. No guarantees. But doing anything is better than being "on hiatus". If nothing will be done, then please explain to us all why AN gets away with shit like this. Well, one could conceivably claim that we have no authority over list.wikia.com. But I do agree that it.. does not show A Nobody in a good light.. let's say. He's made a comment over on the Arbs meta pages.. but I think we'll be handling this in an expedited manner, either by a motion or a case.
|
|
|
|
Ottava |
|
Ãœber Pokemon
Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328
|
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 18th May 2010, 3:41pm) Well, one could conceivably claim that we have no authority over list.wikia.com. But I do agree that it.. does not show A Nobody in a good light.. let's say. He's made a comment over on the Arbs meta pages.. but I think we'll be handling this in an expedited manner, either by a motion or a case.
The comment: "I have logged out of Wikipedia permanently and disabled my email after throwing out my password which can be confirmed per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/A_Nobody this]. I have not only disabled it from Wikipedia, Wikia, and here, I also deactivated it from Yahoo to be sure that I can never re-log into Wikipedia under my old username." So, whatever you do will be moot. That seems to be par for ArbCom, though.
|
|
|
|
Milton Roe |
|
Known alias of J. Random Troll
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined:
Member No.: 5,156
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 17th May 2010, 9:25pm) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Mon 17th May 2010, 7:30am) We may or may not be opening the A Nobody case that was held in abeyance, but right now, we have no case requests Dealing with AN would be a good way to help improve Arbcom's public reputation. Well, maybe. No guarantees. But doing anything is better than being "on hiatus". If nothing will be done, then please explain to us all why AN gets away with shit like this. QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Mon 17th May 2010, 6:48pm) If the "free" milk is lumpy and smells bad, yes. You still don't get it. You're not the one drinking the milk. Who the hell cares what kind of a court and police system you have, if you yourself never have to worry about being judged by it? The Lords of the Shire are never arrested by the Reeve in a feudal system. They're above all that. So who the *&%$ cares if the Reeve (sheriff) is crappy and occasionally hangs the wrong person? It will be a peasant, whoever it is.
|
|
|
|
A Horse With No Name |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
|
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 18th May 2010, 12:25pm) The comment: "I have logged out of Wikipedia permanently and disabled my email after throwing out my password which can be confirmed per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/A_Nobody this]. I have not only disabled it from Wikipedia, Wikia, and here, I also deactivated it from Yahoo to be sure that I can never re-log into Wikipedia under my old username." Actually, this quote is the money shot: "I have nothing to really feel bad about anymore." Good for him -- getting all of that bad blood out his system is the best news. More power to ya, AN -- a lot of the Wikipediots could learn from that. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 18th May 2010, 12:25pm) So, whatever you do will be moot. That seems to be par for ArbCom, though.
Don't be too harsh -- for some of the arbitrators, this is the most important thing that they'll ever accomplish in their lives. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)
|
|
|
|
Ottava |
|
Ãœber Pokemon
Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328
|
QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 18th May 2010, 9:42pm) QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 18th May 2010, 5:25pm) QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 18th May 2010, 3:41pm) Well, one could conceivably claim that we have no authority over list.wikia.com. But I do agree that it.. does not show A Nobody in a good light.. let's say. He's made a comment over on the Arbs meta pages.. but I think we'll be handling this in an expedited manner, either by a motion or a case.
The comment: "I have logged out of Wikipedia permanently and disabled my email after throwing out my password which can be confirmed per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/A_Nobody this]. I have not only disabled it from Wikipedia, Wikia, and here, I also deactivated it from Yahoo to be sure that I can never re-log into Wikipedia under my old username." That is exactly the kind of nonsense that will alienate anyone who supports you. Even though I think he's been unfairly treated for a long time, it's impossible for me to muster any sympathy for people who pull stunts like that. I will assume the "you" means A Nobody. I don't think he cares about any future support if he is disconnecting himself from his past. He is probably going to just join the long line of blatantly obvious restarts that no one can pin down who they are (they should be dubbed "Aitians" or some similar word).
|
|
|
|
everyking |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined:
Member No.: 81
|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 19th May 2010, 7:21am) QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 18th May 2010, 7:01pm) Maybe he thinks he's disconnecting himself from his past, but he's not. I imagine his new account will be detected very quickly, as soon as he pops up on AfD. It's sad. What's even more sad, is when you post clueless nonsense like that--- with a straight face. AN is ALREADY socking. He never stopped socking. And you'll probably never know what his sock accounts are---until and unless someone here points them out. Get real. He always does the same thing. This has been going on for a long time. The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught.
|
|
|
|
Cla68 |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761
|
QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 19th May 2010, 6:36am) QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 19th May 2010, 7:21am) QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 18th May 2010, 7:01pm) Maybe he thinks he's disconnecting himself from his past, but he's not. I imagine his new account will be detected very quickly, as soon as he pops up on AfD. It's sad. What's even more sad, is when you post clueless nonsense like that--- with a straight face. AN is ALREADY socking. He never stopped socking. And you'll probably never know what his sock accounts are---until and unless someone here points them out. Get real. He always does the same thing. This has been going on for a long time. The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught. Notice that no one answered my question here. Either they don't feel the question merits a response or else there is no good answer to it.
|
|
|
|
Jon Awbrey |
|
Ï„á½° δΠμοι παθήματα μαθήματα γÎγονε
Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined:
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619
|
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 19th May 2010, 1:15pm) QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 19th May 2010, 2:36am) The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught.
I must be an outlier with my several paid-editing socks. They all have one purpose (to satisfy the content needs of a paying client). They (typically) do not get caught. You keep dreaming the dream, though, Everyking. It's actually better for my business. And he's wrong about the other thing, too. But at least he's consistent. Jon (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif)
|
|
|
|
MZMcBride |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 671
Joined:
Member No.: 10,962
|
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 19th May 2010, 1:15pm) QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 19th May 2010, 2:36am) The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught. I must be an outlier with my several paid-editing socks. They all have one purpose (to satisfy the content needs of a paying client). They (typically) do not get caught. You keep dreaming the dream, though, Everyking. It's actually better for my business. You're not an outlier, you're just (deliberately) misinterpreting the word "reason" (changed by you to "purpose"). The purpose of the socks is to insert specific content for a specific client. If you were using a single account to insert content for multiple clients, you would probably be caught. If you were using multiple accounts to insert the same content for a client, you would probably be caught. Everyking is right about that. But, uh, congrats, Mr. Kohs, on finally beating Wikipedia? Must feel great. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
Cla68 |
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 19th May 2010, 12:45pm) QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 19th May 2010, 5:07am) Notice that no one answered my question here. Either they don't feel the question merits a response or else there is no good answer to it. No one also answered my question regarding a too-obvious "sock" -- Shadowjams. Any thoughts on who this guy is/was? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 19th May 2010, 2:36am) Get real. He always does the same thing. This has been going on for a long time. The problem with socking is that everyone edits for a reason, and if you sock, you either have to find a new reason to edit, or you get caught.
The only reasons that he would get caught is (1) stupid people who hate him are looking out for him because they don't want him in their playpen, or (2) the checkusers blatantly violate policy and go on "fishing" expeditions to proactively look for "socks." My question was in response to Durova's comment that it wouldn't have been prudent to topic ban everyone involved with the Prem Rawat topic because some would have honored their bans and some wouldn't, and it would have been difficult to prevent the ones who wouldn't from succeeding in their ban evasions, and thus that "side" would have won the POV war. I think my follow up question was the obvious response to that statement. If Wikipedia has no fairly fool-proof enforcement mechanisms, then why bother with trying to establish a process, of which ArbCom is supposed to be the final step, to regulate editor behavior? What an exercise in futility. What this really means is that Wikipedia's administrators are basically hamsters running in wheels, spending a lot of time looking like they're doing something, but actually having no true effect on what's going on around them. Please, someone, explain to me why my observation isn't accurate. This post has been edited by Cla68:
|
|
|
|
thekohser |
|
Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911
|
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Wed 19th May 2010, 4:17pm) You're not an outlier, you're just (deliberately) misinterpreting the word "reason" (changed by you to "purpose"). The purpose of the socks is to insert specific content for a specific client. If you were using a single account to insert content for multiple clients, you would probably be caught. If you were using multiple accounts to insert the same content for a client, you would probably be caught. Everyking is right about that. But, uh, congrats, Mr. Kohs, on finally beating Wikipedia? Must feel great. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) Yeeaaaaah. You've nailed it, MZ. I've never, ever used a single account to insert content for multiple clients. Yep. And I've never, ever used multiple accounts to insert the same content for a client. You're right about those things right there. Everyking is right about that. Shur' nuf. Yup. You betcha.
|
|
|
|
Jon Awbrey |
|
Ï„á½° δΠμοι παθήματα μαθήματα γÎγονε
Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined:
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619
|
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 19th May 2010, 10:11pm) QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Wed 19th May 2010, 4:17pm) You're not an outlier, you're just (deliberately) misinterpreting the word "reason" (changed by you to "purpose"). The purpose of the socks is to insert specific content for a specific client. If you were using a single account to insert content for multiple clients, you would probably be caught. If you were using multiple accounts to insert the same content for a client, you would probably be caught. Everyking is right about that. But, uh, congrats, Mr. Kohs, on finally beating Wikipedia? Must feel great. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) Yeeaaaaah. You've nailed it, MZ. I've never, ever used a single account to insert content for multiple clients. Yep. And I've never, ever used multiple accounts to insert the same content for a client. You're right about those things right there. Everyking is right about that. Shur' nuf. Yup. You betcha. Wikipediot Premiss 1 — One Customer To A Purpose (WP:OCTAP)Wikipediot Premiss 2 — One Purpose To A Customer (WP:OPTAC)Poor Wiki-Poissons — they're swimming in an ocean full of false negatives and false positives both — and they can't even see the water. Jon (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
EricBarbour |
|
blah
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
|
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 19th May 2010, 4:18pm) If Wikipedia has no fairly fool-proof enforcement mechanisms, then why bother with trying to establish a process, of which ArbCom is supposed to be the final step, to regulate editor behavior? What an exercise in futility. What this really means is that Wikipedia's administrators are basically hamsters running in wheels, spending a lot of time looking like they're doing something, but actually having no true effect on what's going on around them. Please, someone, explain to me why my observation isn't accurate. I won't, because it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |